Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning comes out ahead, 69 to 55 and 54 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
69/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.85
- Context256K
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.435 / $0.87
- Context1.05M
Arcee AI
Trinity Large Thinking
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.80
- Context524K
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is our pick
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Trinity Large Thinking (55) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (54). It leads on inputs & features. MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceTrinity Large ThinkingTrinity Large Thinking $0.388 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning $0.40 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.544 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro 1,048,576 · Trinity Large Thinking 524,288 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning: Text, Images, Audio, Video · MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Text · Trinity Large Thinking: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 69 | 62 | 69 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 90 | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 61 | 49 |
| Overall | 100% | 69/100 | 54/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.25 (best) | $0.435 | $0.25 (best) |
| Output | $0.85 | $0.87 | $0.80 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.0036 (best) | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.40 | $0.544 | $0.388 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 4 providers | Official Xiaomi API | Official Arcee API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 524,288 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | OpenOpenMDW-1.1 |
| API model ID | nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning | mimo-v2.5-pro | trinity-large-thinking |
| API providers | 8 | 20 (best) | 6 |
| Released | Apr 28, 2026 | Apr 22, 2026 | Apr 1, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Dec 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning$4.20
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$6.09
Trinity Large Thinking$4.10
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Trinity Large Thinking?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Trinity Large Thinking (55) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (54). It leads on inputs & features. MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Trinity Large Thinking?
Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.80 output per million tokens (official Arcee API price). Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning costs $0.25 input / $0.85 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Nvidia); MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.435 input / $0.87 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.388 per million tokens for Trinity Large Thinking versus $0.40 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning (1× as much) and $0.544 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning has not been scored yet, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has not been scored yet and Trinity Large Thinking has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning, MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Trinity Large Thinking yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 524,288 for Trinity Large Thinking and 256,000 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning. Maximum output per response: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning up to 65,536, MiMo-V2.5-Pro up to 131,072, Trinity Large Thinking up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning accepts text, images, audio and video; MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts text; Trinity Large Thinking accepts text. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (OpenMDW-1.1), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the newest, released Apr 28, 2026. MiMo-V2.5-Pro came out Apr 22, 2026; Trinity Large Thinking came out Apr 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2.5-Pro Dec 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.