MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Solar Pro 4
Too close to call on our weighted score (Solar Pro 4 55, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 54). The right pick depends on what you value most.
XiaomiMiMo-V2.5-Pro
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.435 / $0.87
- Context1.05M
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context524K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Solar Pro 4 55/100, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Solar Pro 4 on price and MiMo-V2.5-Pro for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Pro 4Solar Pro 4 $0.525 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.544 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro 1,048,576 · Solar Pro 4 524,288 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMiMo-V2.5-Pro: Text · Solar Pro 4: Text
- Self-hostingMiMo-V2.5-ProPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 62 | 63 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 49 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi | Solar Pro 4Upstage |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.435 | $0.30 (best) |
| Output | $0.87 (best) | $1.20 |
| Cached input | $0.0036 (best) | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.544 | $0.525 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Xiaomi API | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 524,288 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | mimo-v2.5-pro | solar-pro4 |
| API providers | 20 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Apr 22, 2026 | Aug 6, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | Feb 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro$6.09
- Solar Pro 4$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Solar Pro 4?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Solar Pro 4 55/100, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Solar Pro 4 on price and MiMo-V2.5-Pro for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Solar Pro 4?
Solar Pro 4 is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.435 input / $0.87 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for Solar Pro 4 versus $0.544 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 4 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Solar Pro 4 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 524,288 for Solar Pro 4. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.5-Pro up to 131,072, Solar Pro 4 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts text; Solar Pro 4 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 4 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Solar Pro 4 is the newest, released Aug 6, 2026. MiMo-V2.5-Pro came out Apr 22, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2.5-Pro Dec 2024, Solar Pro 4 Feb 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteThree-way comparison
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIA
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax-M2 HerMiniMax
- Solar Pro 4 vs Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
- Solar Pro 4 vs Ornith 1.5 35B A3BDeepReinforce
- Solar Pro 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
