ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Viv Fast

Viv Fast comes out ahead, 73 to 59 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B

    Released Oct 15, 2026New

    59/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $0.50
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B
  2. Our pick

    Vivgrid

    Viv Fast

    Released Sep 21, 2026New

    73/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.13 / $0.40
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Viv Fast

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Viv Fast is our pick

Viv Fast is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (59). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceViv FastViv Fast $0.198 · Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B 1,048,576 · Viv Fast 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsViv FastNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B: Text · Viv Fast: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BViv Fast
Price50%7380
Inputs & features30%3570
Context window20%6160
Overall100%59/10073/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Viv Fast specifications side by side
SpecificationNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIAViv FastVivgrid
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.20$0.13 (best)
Output$0.50$0.40 (best)
Cached input—$0.05
Blended (3:1)$0.275$0.198 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Vivgrid API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens256,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesYeslow · high · max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model ID—viv-fast
API providers11
ReleasedOct 15, 2026Sep 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Sep 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B$3.00
  • Viv Fast$2.10
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B or Viv Fast?

Viv Fast is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (59). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B or Viv Fast?

Viv Fast is cheaper at $0.13 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Vivgrid API price). Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B costs $0.20 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.198 per million tokens for Viv Fast versus $0.275 for Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet and Viv Fast has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B and Viv Fast yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Viv Fast. Maximum output per response: Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B up to 131,072, Viv Fast up to 256,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B accepts text; Viv Fast accepts text and images. Viv Fast handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Viv Fast is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B is the newest, released Oct 15, 2026. Viv Fast came out Sep 21, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Viv Fast Sep 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons