Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash comes out ahead, 70 to 63 and 59 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
NVIDIANemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B
59/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.50
- Context1.05M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.7 Plus
63/100- ECI147.1
- Price$0.40 / $1.60
- Context1M
- Our pick
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3.1-Flash
70/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context1M
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is our pick
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 70/100 against Qwen3.7 Plus (63) and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (59). Qwen3.7 Plus wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMax-M3.1-Flash $0.263 · Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B $0.275 · Qwen3.7 Plus $0.70 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B 1,048,576 · Qwen3.7 Plus 1,000,000 · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.7 Plus and MiniMax-M3.1-FlashNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B: Text · Qwen3.7 Plus: Text, Images, Video · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B | Qwen3.7 Plus | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 73 | 55 | 74 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 59/100 | 63/100 | 70/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA | Qwen3.7 PlusAlibaba (Qwen) | MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMax |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 147.1 | — |
| ECI rank | — | #71 of 165 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 87.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 34.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 93.3% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.20 | $0.40 | $0.15 (best) |
| Output | $0.50 (best) | $1.60 | $0.60 |
| Cached input | — | $0.08 | $0.015 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.275 | $0.70 | $0.263 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 256K: $1.20 / $4.80 | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Alibaba API | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 64,000 tokens | 512,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | qwen3.7-plus | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash |
| API providers | 1 | 25 (best) | 25 (best) |
| Released | Oct 15, 2026 | Jun 2, 2026 | Oct 19, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Apr 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B$3.00
- Qwen3.7 Plus$7.20
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash$2.70
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B, Qwen3.7 Plus or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash?
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 70/100 against Qwen3.7 Plus (63) and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (59). Qwen3.7 Plus wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B, Qwen3.7 Plus or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash?
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B costs $0.20 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for MiniMax-M3.1-Flash versus $0.275 for Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (1× as much) and $0.70 for Qwen3.7 Plus (2.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet, Qwen3.7 Plus has an ECI of 147.1 and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B, Qwen3.7 Plus and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.7 Plus and 1,000,000 for MiniMax-M3.1-Flash. Maximum output per response: Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B up to 131,072, Qwen3.7 Plus up to 64,000, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash up to 512,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B accepts text; Qwen3.7 Plus accepts text, images and video; MiniMax-M3.1-Flash accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.7 Plus handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.7 Plus and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is the newest, released Oct 19, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B came out Oct 15, 2026; Qwen3.7 Plus came out Jun 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3.7 Plus Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Kolibri 1Aleph Alpha
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextAlibaba (Qwen)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Mercury 2.5Inception
- Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiniMax-M3MiniMax · ECI 146.9
- Qwen3.7 Plus vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA · ECI 146.0
- Qwen3.7 Plus vs Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle · ECI 145.0
