ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

Too close to call on our weighted score (MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 70, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 68). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

    Released Aug 11, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.055 / $0.20
    • Context262K
  2. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

    Released Oct 19, 2026New

    70/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context1M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 70/100, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B on price and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B $0.091 · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash $0.263 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMax-M3.1-Flash 1,000,000 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsMiniMax-M3.1-FlashNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: Text · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BMiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Price50%9574
Inputs & features30%4570
Context window20%3760
Overall100%68/10070/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash specifications side by side
SpecificationNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAMiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMax
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.055 (best)$0.15
Output$0.20 (best)$0.60
Cached input—$0.015
Blended (3:1)$0.091 (best)$0.263
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 10 providersOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output262,144 tokens512,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoYes
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model IDnvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3bMiniMax-M3.1-Flash
API providers1525 (best)
ReleasedAug 11, 2026Oct 19, 2026
Knowledge cutoffSep 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B$0.95
  • MiniMax-M3.1-Flash$2.70
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 70/100, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B on price and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.055 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers; free on Nvidia). MiniMax-M3.1-Flash costs $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.091 per million tokens for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B versus $0.263 for MiniMax-M3.1-Flash (2.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has not been scored yet and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B. Maximum output per response: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B up to 262,144, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash up to 512,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B accepts text; MiniMax-M3.1-Flash accepts text, images and video. MiniMax-M3.1-Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is proprietary.

Which is newer?

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is the newest, released Oct 19, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B came out Aug 11, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Sep 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.