Muse Wonder vs Muse Wonder Full
Muse Wonder comes out ahead, 84 to 72 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
MetaMuse Wonder
84/100- ECI161.7
- Price$4.00 / $20.00
- Context1.05M
- Meta
Muse Wonder Full
72/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Muse Wonder is our pick
Muse Wonder is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against Muse Wonder Full (72). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMuse WonderMuse Wonder $8.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Muse Wonder Full unpriced
- Longest contextAbout the sameMuse Wonder 1,048,576 · Muse Wonder Full 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsMuse WonderMuse Wonder: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Muse Wonder Full: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Muse Wonder | Muse Wonder Full |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 100 | 80 |
| Context window | 40% | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 84/100 | 72/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Muse WonderMeta | Muse Wonder FullMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 161.7 | — |
| ECI rank | #13 of 165 | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 82.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 99.4% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $4.00 | — |
| Output | $20.00 | — |
| Cached input | $0.20 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $8.00 | — |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | — |
| Price source | Official Meta API | — |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | — |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | muse-wonder-1.0 | — |
| API providers | 9 | — |
| Released | Oct 12, 2026 | Oct 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Muse Wonder$80.00
- Muse Wonder Full—
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Muse Wonder or Muse Wonder Full?
Muse Wonder is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against Muse Wonder Full (72). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Muse Wonder Full?
Muse Wonder is cheaper at $4.00 input / $20.00 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $8.00 per million tokens for Muse Wonder versus . Muse Wonder Full has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Muse Wonder has an ECI of 161.7 and Muse Wonder Full has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Muse Wonder up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Muse Wonder accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Muse Wonder Full accepts text, images, audio and video. Muse Wonder handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Muse Wonder is the newest, released Oct 12, 2026. Muse Wonder Full came out Oct 12, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GPT-5.6 SolThree-way comparison
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · ECI 162.6
- Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5Anthropic · ECI 164.5
- Muse Wonder vs Kimi K3Moonshot AI · ECI 158.3
- Muse Wonder vs Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle · ECI 166.1
- Muse Wonder Full vs Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA
- Muse Wonder Full vs Mercury 3Inception
