Muse Spark 1.2 vs Muse Wonder
Too close to call on our weighted score (Muse Spark 1.2 71, Muse Wonder 68). The right pick depends on what you value most.
MetaMuse Spark 1.2
71/100- ECI155.2
- Price$1.25 / $4.25
- Context1.05M
- Meta
Muse Wonder
68/100- ECI161.7
- Price$4.00 / $20.00
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Muse Spark 1.2 71/100, Muse Wonder 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Muse Wonder for raw capability and Muse Spark 1.2 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityMuse WonderCapabilities Index (ECI): Muse Wonder 161.7 · Muse Spark 1.2 155.2
- Lowest priceMuse Spark 1.2Muse Spark 1.2 $2.00 · Muse Wonder $8.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameMuse Spark 1.2 1,048,576 · Muse Wonder 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMuse Spark 1.2: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Muse Wonder: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Muse Spark 1.2 | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 83 | 91 |
| Price | 25% | 34 | 7 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 100 | 100 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 71/100 | 68/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Muse Spark 1.2Meta | Muse WonderMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 155.2 | 161.7 (best) |
| ECI rank | #38 of 165 | #13 of 165 (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 82.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 99.4% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 60.3% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.25 (best) | $4.00 |
| Output | $4.25 (best) | $20.00 |
| Cached input | $0.15 (best) | $0.20 |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00 (best) | $8.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Meta API | Official Meta API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | muse-spark-1.2 | muse-wonder-1.0 |
| API providers | 18 (best) | 9 |
| Released | Aug 5, 2026 | Oct 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Muse Spark 1.2$21.00
- Muse Wonder$80.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Muse Spark 1.2 or Muse Wonder?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Muse Spark 1.2 71/100, Muse Wonder 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Muse Wonder for raw capability and Muse Spark 1.2 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Muse Wonder?
Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). Muse Wonder costs $4.00 input / $20.00 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for Muse Spark 1.2 versus $8.00 for Muse Wonder (4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Muse Wonder scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Muse Wonder 161.7 (#13 of 165) and Muse Spark 1.2 155.2 (#38 of 165). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (159.2–164.6 vs 152.9–157.6), so the gap is a real one.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Muse Spark 1.2 and Muse Wonder yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Muse Wonder leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.2 and Muse Wonder share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Muse Spark 1.2 up to 131,072, Muse Wonder up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Muse Spark 1.2 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Muse Wonder accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Muse Spark 1.2 and Muse Wonder are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Muse Wonder is the newest, released Oct 12, 2026. Muse Spark 1.2 came out Aug 5, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GLM-5.3Three-way comparison
- Muse Spark 1.2 vs GLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 156.2
- Muse Spark 1.2 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle · ECI 154.7
- Muse Spark 1.2 vs Grok 4.5xAI · ECI 154.4
- Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Alibaba (Qwen) · ECI 156.2
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · ECI 162.6
- Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5Anthropic · ECI 164.5
