Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5V-Turbo
Muse Spark 1.1 comes out ahead, 57 to 49 on our weighted score, though GLM-5V-Turbo is 5% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
MetaMuse Spark 1.1
57/100- ECI154.3
- Price$1.25 / $4.25
- Context1.05M
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-5V-Turbo
49/100- ECI—
- Price$1.20 / $4.00
- Context200K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Muse Spark 1.1 is our pick
Muse Spark 1.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against GLM-5V-Turbo (49). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGLM-5V-TurboGLM-5V-Turbo $1.90 · Muse Spark 1.1 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.1 1,048,576 · GLM-5V-Turbo 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMuse Spark 1.1: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · GLM-5V-Turbo: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Muse Spark 1.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 36 | 37 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 90 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 57/100 | 49/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | GLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 154.3 | — |
| ECI rank | #35 of 148 | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 57.8% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.25 | $1.20 (best) |
| Output | $4.25 | $4.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.15 (best) | $0.24 |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00 | $1.90 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Meta API | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 200,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | muse-spark-1.1 | glm-5v-turbo |
| API providers | 13 | 14 (best) |
| Released | Jul 9, 2026 | Apr 1, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Muse Spark 1.1$21.00
- GLM-5V-Turbo$20.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against GLM-5V-Turbo (49). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper at $1.20 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.90 per million tokens for GLM-5V-Turbo versus $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.1 (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Muse Spark 1.1 has an ECI of 154.3 and GLM-5V-Turbo has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Muse Spark 1.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 200,000 for GLM-5V-Turbo. Maximum output per response: Muse Spark 1.1 up to 131,072, GLM-5V-Turbo up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Muse Spark 1.1 accepts text, images, PDFs and video; GLM-5V-Turbo accepts text, images, PDFs and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Muse Spark 1.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the newest, released Jul 9, 2026. GLM-5V-Turbo came out Apr 1, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Gemini 3.6 FlashThree-way comparison
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle · ECI 154.3
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.5xAI · ECI 154.0
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 155.8
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Alibaba (Qwen) · ECI 155.2
- GLM-5V-Turbo vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
- GLM-5V-Turbo vs DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
