ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5V-Turbo vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash comes out ahead, 63 to 57 and 49 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Meta

    Muse Spark 1.1

    Released Jul 9, 2026

    57/100
    • ECI154.3
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
  2. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5V-Turbo

    Released Apr 1, 2026

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.00
    • Context200K
  3. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 3.6 Flash

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    63/100
    • ECI154.3
    • Price$0.75 / $3.75
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Gemini 3.6 Flash is our pick

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Muse Spark 1.1 (57) and GLM-5V-Turbo (49). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash $1.50 · GLM-5V-Turbo $1.90 · Muse Spark 1.1 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMuse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1 1,048,576 · Gemini 3.6 Flash 1,048,576 · GLM-5V-Turbo 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · GLM-5V-Turbo: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Gemini 3.6 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMuse Spark 1.1GLM-5V-TurboGemini 3.6 Flash
Price50%363742
Inputs & features30%9080100
Context window20%613261
Overall100%57/10049/10063/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5V-Turbo vs Gemini 3.6 Flash specifications side by side
SpecificationMuse Spark 1.1MetaGLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)154.3—154.3 (best)
ECI rank#35 of 148—#34 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions——94.1%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics——59.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics——94.2%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions57.8%—66.2% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25$1.20$0.75 (best)
Output$4.25$4.00$3.75 (best)
Cached input$0.15$0.24$0.075 (best)
Blended (3:1)$2.00$1.90$1.50 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Meta APIOfficial Z.AI APIOfficial Google API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)200,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesYesYes
AudioNoNoYes
VideoYesYesYes
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhighYesYesminimal · low · medium · high
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDmuse-spark-1.1glm-5v-turbogemini-3.6-flash
API providers131425 (best)
ReleasedJul 9, 2026Apr 1, 2026Jul 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Mar 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Muse Spark 1.1$21.00
  • GLM-5V-Turbo$20.00
  • Gemini 3.6 Flash$15.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1, GLM-5V-Turbo or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Muse Spark 1.1 (57) and GLM-5V-Turbo (49). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1, GLM-5V-Turbo or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 input / $3.75 output per million tokens (official Google API price). GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.20 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.50 per million tokens for Gemini 3.6 Flash versus $1.90 for GLM-5V-Turbo (1.3× as much) and $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.1 (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Muse Spark 1.1 has an ECI of 154.3, GLM-5V-Turbo has not been scored yet and Gemini 3.6 Flash has an ECI of 154.3.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Muse Spark 1.1, GLM-5V-Turbo and Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.6 Flash have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 200,000 for GLM-5V-Turbo. Maximum output per response: Muse Spark 1.1 up to 131,072, GLM-5V-Turbo up to 131,072, Gemini 3.6 Flash up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts text, images, PDFs and video; GLM-5V-Turbo accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3.6 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Muse Spark 1.1, GLM-5V-Turbo and Gemini 3.6 Flash are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the newest, released Jul 21, 2026. Muse Spark 1.1 came out Jul 9, 2026; GLM-5V-Turbo came out Apr 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.6 Flash Mar 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.