Morph V3 Fast vs Qwen3 Coder Flash vs GLM-4.5V
Qwen3 Coder Flash comes out ahead, 51 to 48 and 32 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Morph
Morph V3 Fast
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $1.20
- Context262K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 Coder Flash
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.50
- Context1M
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5V
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $1.80
- Context64K
Qwen3 Coder Flash is our pick
Qwen3 Coder Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against GLM-4.5V (48) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on price and context window. GLM-4.5V wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3 Coder Flash $0.60 · Morph V3 Fast $0.90 · GLM-4.5V $0.90 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3 Coder Flash 1,000,000 · Morph V3 Fast 262,144 · GLM-4.5V 64,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGLM-4.5VMorph V3 Fast: Text · Qwen3 Coder Flash: Text · GLM-4.5V: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingGLM-4.5VPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Morph V3 Fast | Qwen3 Coder Flash | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 50 | 58 | 50 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 60 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 32/100 | 51/100 | 48/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Morph V3 FastMorph | Qwen3 Coder FlashAlibaba (Qwen) | GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.80 | $0.30 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $1.20 (best) | $1.50 | $1.80 |
| Cached input | — | $0.06 (best) | $0.11 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.90 | $0.60 (best) | $0.90 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.50 / $2.50 | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 5 providers | Official Alibaba API | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | qwen3-coder-flash | glm-4.5v |
| API providers | 5 | 10 | 17 (best) |
| Released | Jul 7, 2025 | Jul 28, 2025 | Aug 11, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Morph V3 Fast$10.40
- Qwen3 Coder Flash$6.00
- GLM-4.5V$9.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Morph V3 Fast, Qwen3 Coder Flash or GLM-4.5V?
Qwen3 Coder Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against GLM-4.5V (48) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on price and context window. GLM-4.5V wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Morph V3 Fast, Qwen3 Coder Flash or GLM-4.5V?
Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Morph V3 Fast costs $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); GLM-4.5V costs $0.60 input / $1.80 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.60 per million tokens for Qwen3 Coder Flash versus $0.90 for Morph V3 Fast (1.5× as much) and $0.90 for GLM-4.5V (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet, Qwen3 Coder Flash has not been scored yet and GLM-4.5V has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Morph V3 Fast, Qwen3 Coder Flash and GLM-4.5V yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Morph V3 Fast does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Flash has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Morph V3 Fast and 64,000 for GLM-4.5V. Maximum output per response: Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072, Qwen3 Coder Flash up to 65,536, GLM-4.5V up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Morph V3 Fast accepts text; Qwen3 Coder Flash accepts text; GLM-4.5V accepts text, images and video. GLM-4.5V handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-4.5V publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Morph V3 Fast and Qwen3 Coder Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GLM-4.5V is the newest, released Aug 11, 2025. Qwen3 Coder Flash came out Jul 28, 2025; Morph V3 Fast came out Jul 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 Coder Flash Apr 2025, GLM-4.5V Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
