ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Morph V3 Fast vs Palmyra X5 vs Pixtral Large (25.02)

Palmyra X5 comes out ahead, 47 to 33 and 32 on our weighted score, though Morph V3 Fast is 2.2× cheaper per token.

  1. Morph

    Morph V3 Fast

    Released Jul 7, 2025

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.80 / $1.20
    • Context262K
  2. Our pick

    Writer

    Palmyra X5

    Released Apr 28, 2025

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $6.00
    • Context1M
  3. Mistral AI

    Pixtral Large (25.02)

    Released Apr 8, 2025

    33/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Palmyra X5 is our pick

Palmyra X5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Morph V3 Fast wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast $0.90 · Palmyra X5 $1.95 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextPalmyra X5Palmyra X5 1,000,000 · Morph V3 Fast 262,144 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPalmyra X5 and Pixtral Large (25.02)Morph V3 Fast: Text · Palmyra X5: Text, Images · Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMorph V3 FastPalmyra X5Pixtral Large (25.02)
Price50%503526
Inputs & features30%06050
Context window20%376024
Overall100%32/10047/10033/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Morph V3 Fast vs Palmyra X5 vs Pixtral Large (25.02) specifications side by side
SpecificationMorph V3 FastMorphPalmyra X5WriterPixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.80$0.60 (best)$2.00
Output$1.20 (best)$6.00$6.00
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.90 (best)$1.95$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 5 providersMedian of 4 providersMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)8,192 tokens8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model ID———
API providers5 (best)43
ReleasedJul 7, 2025Apr 28, 2025Apr 8, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Morph V3 Fast$10.40
  • Palmyra X5$18.00
  • Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Morph V3 Fast, Palmyra X5 or Pixtral Large (25.02)?

Palmyra X5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Morph V3 Fast wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Morph V3 Fast, Palmyra X5 or Pixtral Large (25.02)?

Morph V3 Fast is cheaper at $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Palmyra X5 costs $0.60 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers); Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for Morph V3 Fast versus $1.95 for Palmyra X5 (2.2× as much) and $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (3.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet, Palmyra X5 has not been scored yet and Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Morph V3 Fast, Palmyra X5 and Pixtral Large (25.02) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Morph V3 Fast does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Palmyra X5 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Morph V3 Fast and 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02). Maximum output per response: Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072, Palmyra X5 up to 8,192, Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Morph V3 Fast accepts text; Palmyra X5 accepts text and images; Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images. Palmyra X5 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Morph V3 Fast, Palmyra X5 and Pixtral Large (25.02) are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Morph V3 Fast is the newest, released Jul 7, 2025. Palmyra X5 came out Apr 28, 2025; Pixtral Large (25.02) came out Apr 8, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.