ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs Mistral Large vs Gemma 2 27B

Mistral Large comes out ahead, 44 to 35 and 34 on our weighted score, though Gemma 2 27B is 13% cheaper per token.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

    Released Apr 17, 2024

    34/100
    • ECI122.0
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context66K
  2. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Mistral Large

    Released Feb 26, 2024

    44/100
    • ECI122.0
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context128K
  3. Google

    Gemma 2 27B

    Released Jul 13, 2024

    35/100
    • ECI122.1
    • Price$0.65 / $0.65
    • Context8K
01 — Verdict

Mistral Large is our pick

Mistral Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Gemma 2 27B (35) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (34). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Gemma 2 27B wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemma 2 27BCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 2 27B 122.1 · Mistral Large 122.0 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0
  • Lowest priceGemma 2 27BGemma 2 27B $0.65 · Mistral Large $0.75 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMistral LargeMistral Large 128,000 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 65,536 · Gemma 2 27B 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsMixtral 8x22B Instruct and Mistral LargeMixtral 8x22B Instruct: Text, PDFs · Mistral Large: Text, PDFs · Gemma 2 27B: Text
  • Self-hostingMixtral 8x22B Instruct and Gemma 2 27BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMixtral 8x22B InstructMistral LargeGemma 2 27B
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%424242
Price25%265356
Inputs & features15%35450
Context window10%12240
Overall100%34/10044/10035/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs Mistral Large vs Gemma 2 27B specifications side by side
SpecificationMixtral 8x22B InstructMistral AIMistral LargeMistral AIGemma 2 27BGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)122.0122.0122.1 (best)
ECI rank#155 of 165#153 of 165#152 of 165 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions34.1%38.8% (best)36.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—1.9% (best)1.4%
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$0.50 (best)$0.65
Output$6.00$1.50$0.65 (best)
Cached input—$0.05—
Blended (3:1)$3.00$0.75$0.65 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 5 providersOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window65,536 tokens128,000 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Max output52,428 tokens102,400 tokens (best)2,048 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsYesYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpen
API model ID—mistral-large-latest—
API providers511 (best)3
ReleasedApr 17, 2024Feb 26, 2024Jul 13, 2024
Knowledge cutoffJan 31, 2024Nov 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$32.00
  • Mistral Large$8.00
  • Gemma 2 27B$7.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, Mistral Large or Gemma 2 27B?

Mistral Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Gemma 2 27B (35) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (34). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Gemma 2 27B wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, Mistral Large or Gemma 2 27B?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Mistral Large costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.65 per million tokens for Gemma 2 27B versus $0.75 for Mistral Large (1.2× as much) and $3.00 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (4.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 2 27B 122.1 (#152 of 165), Mistral Large 122.0 (#153 of 165) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0 (#155 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (115.8–124.1 vs 115.7–124.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Large 38.8%, Gemma 2 27B 36.5%, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 34.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, Mistral Large and Gemma 2 27B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemma 2 27B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Note that Gemma 2 27B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 65,536 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and 8,192 for Gemma 2 27B. Maximum output per response: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct up to 52,428, Mistral Large up to 102,400, Gemma 2 27B up to 2,048 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct accepts text and PDFs; Mistral Large accepts text and PDFs; Gemma 2 27B accepts text. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and Gemma 2 27B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Large is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemma 2 27B is the newest, released Jul 13, 2024. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct came out Apr 17, 2024; Mistral Large came out Feb 26, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct Jan 31, 2024, Mistral Large Nov 30, 2024, Gemma 2 27B Jun 30, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.