ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 vs Gemma 2 27B

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct comes out ahead, 37 to 28 and 22 on our weighted score, though Gemma 2 27B is 4.6× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

    Released Apr 17, 2024

    37/100
    • ECI122.0
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context66K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3

    Released May 22, 2024

    22/100
    • ECI109.0
    • Price—
    • Context33K
  3. Google

    Gemma 2 27B

    Released Jul 13, 2024

    28/100
    • ECI122.1
    • Price$0.65 / $0.65
    • Context8K
01 — Verdict

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is our pick

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 37/100 against Gemma 2 27B (28) and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 (22). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.

  • CapabilityGemma 2 27BCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 2 27B 122.1 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0 · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 109.0
  • Lowest priceGemma 2 27BGemma 2 27B $0.65 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 unpriced
  • Longest contextMixtral 8x22B InstructMixtral 8x22B Instruct 65,536 · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 32,768 · Gemma 2 27B 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsMixtral 8x22B InstructMixtral 8x22B Instruct: Text, PDFs · Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3: Text · Gemma 2 27B: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMixtral 8x22B InstructMistral 7B Instruct v0.3Gemma 2 27B
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)67%422642
Inputs & features20%35250
Context window13%1200
Overall100%37/10022/10028/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 vs Gemma 2 27B specifications side by side
SpecificationMixtral 8x22B InstructMistral AIMistral 7B Instruct v0.3Mistral AIGemma 2 27BGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)122.0109.0122.1 (best)
ECI rank#155 of 165#164 of 165#152 of 165 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions34.1%15.2%36.5% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—0.3%1.4% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00—$0.65 (best)
Output$6.00—$0.65 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.00—$0.65 (best)
Long-context rateSame rate—Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 5 providers—Median of 3 providers
Limits
Context window65,536 tokens (best)32,768 tokens8,192 tokens
Max output52,428 tokens (best)32,768 tokens2,048 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenApache 2.0Open
API model ID———
API providers5 (best)13
ReleasedApr 17, 2024May 22, 2024Jul 13, 2024
Knowledge cutoffJan 31, 2024—Jun 30, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$32.00
  • Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3—
  • Gemma 2 27B$7.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 or Gemma 2 27B?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 37/100 against Gemma 2 27B (28) and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 (22). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.

Which is cheaper, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 or Gemma 2 27B?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.65 per million tokens for Gemma 2 27B versus $3.00 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (4.6× as much). Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 2 27B 122.1 (#152 of 165), Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0 (#155 of 165) and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 109.0 (#164 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (115.8–124.1 vs 115.7–124.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemma 2 27B 36.5%, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 34.1%, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 15.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 and Gemma 2 27B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemma 2 27B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Note that Gemma 2 27B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct has the largest context window at 65,536 tokens, against 32,768 for Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 and 8,192 for Gemma 2 27B. Maximum output per response: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct up to 52,428, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 up to 32,768, Gemma 2 27B up to 2,048 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct accepts text and PDFs; Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 accepts text; Gemma 2 27B accepts text. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Gemma 2 27B is the newest, released Jul 13, 2024. Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 came out May 22, 2024; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct came out Apr 17, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct Jan 31, 2024, Gemma 2 27B Jun 30, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.