ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-4o

GPT-4o comes out ahead, 43 to 35 and 34 on our weighted score, though Gemma 2 27B is 6.7× cheaper per token.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

    Released Apr 17, 2024

    34/100
    • ECI122.0
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context66K
  2. Google

    Gemma 2 27B

    Released Jul 13, 2024

    35/100
    • ECI122.1
    • Price$0.65 / $0.65
    • Context8K
  3. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-4o

    Released May 13, 2024

    43/100
    • ECI129.0
    • Price$2.50 / $10.00
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

GPT-4o is our pick

GPT-4o is the better all-round choice, scoring 43/100 against Gemma 2 27B (35) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (34). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. Gemma 2 27B wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-4oCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o 129.0 · Gemma 2 27B 122.1 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0
  • Lowest priceGemma 2 27BGemma 2 27B $0.65 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $3.00 · GPT-4o $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-4oGPT-4o 128,000 · Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 65,536 · Gemma 2 27B 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-4oMixtral 8x22B Instruct: Text, PDFs · Gemma 2 27B: Text · GPT-4o: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingMixtral 8x22B Instruct and Gemma 2 27BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMixtral 8x22B InstructGemma 2 27BGPT-4o
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%424251
Price25%265619
Inputs & features15%35070
Context window10%12024
Overall100%34/10035/10043/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-4o specifications side by side
SpecificationMixtral 8x22B InstructMistral AIGemma 2 27BGoogleGPT-4oOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)122.0122.1129.0 (best)
ECI rank#155 of 165#152 of 165#141 of 165 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions34.1%36.5%48.9% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—1.4%6.3% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$0.65 (best)$2.50
Output$6.00$0.65 (best)$10.00
Cached input——$1.25
Blended (3:1)$3.00$0.65 (best)$4.38
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 5 providersMedian of 3 providersOfficial OpenAI API
Limits
Context window65,536 tokens8,192 tokens128,000 tokens (best)
Max output52,428 tokens (best)2,048 tokens16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsYesNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model ID——gpt-4o
API providers5326 (best)
ReleasedApr 17, 2024Jul 13, 2024May 13, 2024
Knowledge cutoffJan 31, 2024Jun 30, 2024Sep 2023
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$32.00
  • Gemma 2 27B$7.80
  • GPT-4o$45.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, Gemma 2 27B or GPT-4o?

GPT-4o is the better all-round choice, scoring 43/100 against Gemma 2 27B (35) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (34). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. Gemma 2 27B wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, Gemma 2 27B or GPT-4o?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); GPT-4o costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.65 per million tokens for Gemma 2 27B versus $3.00 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (4.6× as much) and $4.38 for GPT-4o (6.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-4o scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o 129.0 (#141 of 165), Gemma 2 27B 122.1 (#152 of 165) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0 (#155 of 165). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (124.7–131.3 vs 115.8–124.1), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-4o 48.9%, Gemma 2 27B 36.5%, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 34.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, Gemma 2 27B and GPT-4o yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-4o leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Note that Gemma 2 27B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4o has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 65,536 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and 8,192 for Gemma 2 27B. Maximum output per response: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct up to 52,428, Gemma 2 27B up to 2,048, GPT-4o up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct accepts text and PDFs; Gemma 2 27B accepts text; GPT-4o accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-4o handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and Gemma 2 27B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemma 2 27B is the newest, released Jul 13, 2024. GPT-4o came out May 13, 2024; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct came out Apr 17, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct Jan 31, 2024, Gemma 2 27B Jun 30, 2024, GPT-4o Sep 2023.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.