Mistral Small 4 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Mistral Small 4 comes out ahead, 65 to 55 and 54 on our weighted score, though Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is 33% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 4
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context256K
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.65
- Context262K
Mistral AI
Voxtral Small 24B 2507
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context33K
Mistral Small 4 is our pick
Mistral Small 4 is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (55) and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (54). It leads on inputs & features. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceVoxtral Small 24B 2507Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.175 · Mistral Small 4 $0.263 · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 262,144 · Mistral Small 4 256,000 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsMistral Small 4 and Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral Small 4: Text, Images · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B: Text · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Mistral Small 4 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 74 | 73 | 82 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 35 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 37 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 54/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.15 | $0.15 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $0.60 | $0.65 | $0.40 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.015 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.263 | $0.275 | $0.175 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Median of 16 providers | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeshigh | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | mistral-small-2603 | — | voxtral-small-latest |
| API providers | 21 (best) | 18 | 10 |
| Released | Mar 16, 2026 | Mar 11, 2026 | Jul 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2025 | Jun 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Mistral Small 4$2.70
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B$2.80
Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Mistral Small 4, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
Mistral Small 4 is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (55) and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (54). It leads on inputs & features. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 4, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.15 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 versus $0.263 for Mistral Small 4 (1.5× as much) and $0.275 for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (1.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Mistral Small 4 has not been scored yet, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Small 4, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Mistral Small 4 and 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507. Maximum output per response: Mistral Small 4 up to 256,000, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B up to 262,144, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Mistral Small 4 accepts text and images; Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B accepts text; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio. Mistral Small 4 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Mistral Small 4 is the newest, released Mar 16, 2026. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B came out Mar 11, 2026; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Small 4 Jun 2025, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B Jun 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.