ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Mistral Small 4 vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Mistral Small 4 comes out ahead, 65 to 54 and 52 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Mistral Small 4

    Released Mar 16, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context256K
  2. xAI

    Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)

    Released Mar 9, 2026

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
  3. NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

    Released Mar 11, 2026

    54/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.65
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Mistral Small 4 is our pick

Mistral Small 4 is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (54) and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (52). Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMistral Small 4Mistral Small 4 $0.263 · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B $0.275 · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) $1.56 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) 1,000,000 · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 262,144 · Mistral Small 4 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Mistral Small 4: Text, Images · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B: Text
  • Self-hostingMistral Small 4 and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Small 4Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
Price50%743973
Inputs & features30%707035
Context window20%366037
Overall100%65/10052/10054/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Small 4 vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Small 4Mistral AIGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)xAINemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15 (best)$1.25$0.15 (best)
Output$0.60 (best)$2.50$0.65
Cached input$0.015 (best)$0.20—
Blended (3:1)$0.263 (best)$1.56$0.275
Long-context rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIOfficial xAI APIMedian of 16 providers
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output256,000 tokens30,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYeshighNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpen
API model IDmistral-small-2603grok-4.20-0309-non-reasoning—
API providers21 (best)1318
ReleasedMar 16, 2026Mar 9, 2026Mar 11, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJun 2025—Jun 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Small 4$2.70
  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)$17.50
  • Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B$2.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Small 4, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B?

Mistral Small 4 is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (54) and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (52). Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 4, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B?

Mistral Small 4 is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.15 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers); Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) costs $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for Mistral Small 4 versus $0.275 for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (1× as much) and $1.56 for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Mistral Small 4 has not been scored yet, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has not been scored yet and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Small 4, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B and 256,000 for Mistral Small 4. Maximum output per response: Mistral Small 4 up to 256,000, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) up to 30,000, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Small 4 accepts text and images; Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs; Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B accepts text. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Mistral Small 4 and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Small 4 is the newest, released Mar 16, 2026. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B came out Mar 11, 2026; Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) came out Mar 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Small 4 Jun 2025, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B Jun 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.