ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 71 to 60 and 46 on our weighted score, though Mistral Small 3.2 is 14% cheaper per token.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Small 3.2

    Released Jun 20, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI131.7
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context128K
  2. Meta

    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    46/100
    • ECI116.6
    • Price$0.152 / $0.167
    • Context128K
  3. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

    Released Jun 17, 2025

    71/100
    • ECI133.9
    • Price$0.10 / $0.40
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is our pick

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against Mistral Small 3.2 (60) and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (46). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 133.9 · Mistral Small 3.2 131.7 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 116.6
  • Lowest priceMistral Small 3.2Mistral Small 3.2 $0.15 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.156 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Mistral Small 3.2 128,000 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMistral Small 3.2: Text, Images · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingMistral Small 3.2 and Llama-3.1-8B-InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Small 3.2Llama-3.1-8B-InstructGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%553658
Price25%898886
Inputs & features15%5025100
Context window10%242461
Overall100%60/10046/10071/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Small 3.2Mistral AILlama-3.1-8B-InstructMetaGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)131.7116.6133.9 (best)
ECI rank#123 of 148#145 of 148#118 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions49.1% (best)27.0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics30.3% (best)1.7%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.10 (best)$0.152$0.10 (best)
Output$0.30$0.167 (best)$0.40
Cached input——$0.01
Blended (3:1)$0.15 (best)$0.156$0.175
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 9 providersOfficial Google API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output16,384 tokens4,096 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningNoNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model IDmistral-small-2506—gemini-2.5-flash-lite
API providers6920 (best)
ReleasedJun 20, 2025Jul 23, 2024Jun 17, 2025
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Dec 2023Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Small 3.2$1.60
  • Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$1.85
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Small 3.2, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against Mistral Small 3.2 (60) and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (46). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct costs $0.152 input / $0.167 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers); Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Mistral Small 3.2 versus $0.156 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (1× as much) and $0.175 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 133.9 (#118 of 148), Mistral Small 3.2 131.7 (#123 of 148) and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 116.6 (#145 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (129.8–136.3 vs 126.6–133.9), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Small 3.2, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.2 and 128,000 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct. Maximum output per response: Mistral Small 3.2 up to 16,384, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Small 3.2 accepts text and images; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Mistral Small 3.2 and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the newest, released Jun 20, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite came out Jun 17, 2025; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Small 3.2 Mar 2025, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.