Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Ministral 8B Instruct
Too close to call on our weighted score (Ministral 8B Instruct 42, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 42). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Meta
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
42/100- ECI116.6
- Price$0.152 / $0.167
- Context128K
Mistral AI
Ministral 8B Instruct
42/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Ministral 8B Instruct 42/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 42/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Ministral 8B Instruct for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct has no Capabilities Index score yet.
- CapabilityMinistral 8B InstructShared benchmarks: Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2% · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%
- Lowest priceMinistral 8B InstructMinistral 8B Instruct $0.15 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.156 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMinistral 8B InstructMinistral 8B Instruct 131,072 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text · Ministral 8B Instruct: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | Ministral 8B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityShared benchmarks | 50% | 27 | 27 |
| Price | 25% | 88 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 42/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 116.6 | — |
| ECI rank | #145 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 27.0% | 27.2% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 1.7% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.152 | $0.15 (best) |
| Output | $0.167 | $0.15 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.156 | $0.15 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 9 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 8,192 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | OpenMistral Research License |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 9 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Jul 23, 2024 | Oct 16, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2023 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$1.85
Ministral 8B Instruct$1.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct or Ministral 8B Instruct?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Ministral 8B Instruct 42/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 42/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Ministral 8B Instruct for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct has no Capabilities Index score yet.
Which is cheaper, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct or Ministral 8B Instruct?
Ministral 8B Instruct is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct costs $0.152 input / $0.167 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Ministral 8B Instruct versus $0.156 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond): Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2% and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Ministral 8B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Ministral 8B Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ministral 8B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096, Ministral 8B Instruct up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text; Ministral 8B Instruct accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Mistral Research License), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Ministral 8B Instruct is the newest, released Oct 16, 2024. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.