ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Mistral Medium 3 vs QwQ Plus

Too close to call on our weighted score (Mistral Medium 3 53, QwQ Plus 52). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Medium 3

    Released May 7, 2025

    53/100
    • ECI134.1
    • Price$0.40 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    QwQ Plus

    Released Mar 5, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.80 / $2.40
    • Context131K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Mistral Medium 3 53/100, QwQ Plus 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: QwQ Plus for raw capability and Mistral Medium 3 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because QwQ Plus has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityQwQ PlusShared benchmarks: QwQ Plus 65.4% · Mistral Medium 3 59.5%
  • Lowest priceMistral Medium 3Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 · QwQ Plus $1.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameMistral Medium 3 131,072 · QwQ Plus 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsMistral Medium 3Mistral Medium 3: Text, Images · QwQ Plus: Text
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Medium 3QwQ Plus
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%6065
Price25%5446
Inputs & features15%5035
Context window10%2424
Overall100%53/10052/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Medium 3 vs QwQ Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Medium 3Mistral AIQwQ PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)134.1—
ECI rank#117 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions59.5%65.4% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics32.2%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.40 (best)$0.80
Output$2.00 (best)$2.40
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.80 (best)$1.20
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDmistral-medium-2505qwq-plus
API providers5 (best)2
ReleasedMay 7, 2025Mar 5, 2025
Knowledge cutoffMay 2025Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Medium 3$8.00
  • QwQ Plus$12.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Medium 3 or QwQ Plus?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Mistral Medium 3 53/100, QwQ Plus 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: QwQ Plus for raw capability and Mistral Medium 3 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because QwQ Plus has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3 or QwQ Plus?

Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper at $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). QwQ Plus costs $0.80 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.80 per million tokens for Mistral Medium 3 versus $1.20 for QwQ Plus (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond): QwQ Plus 65.4% and Mistral Medium 3 59.5%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — QwQ Plus 65.4%, Mistral Medium 3 59.5%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Medium 3 and QwQ Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, QwQ Plus leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3 and QwQ Plus share the same 131,072-token context window. Maximum output per response: Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072, QwQ Plus up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images; QwQ Plus accepts text. Mistral Medium 3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Mistral Medium 3 and QwQ Plus are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Mistral Medium 3 is the newest, released May 7, 2025. QwQ Plus came out Mar 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Medium 3 May 2025, QwQ Plus Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.