ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Mistral Medium 3 vs Kimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-4.1 mini

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-4.1 mini 60, Kimi K2 Thinking 58, Mistral Medium 3 53). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Medium 3

    Released May 7, 2025

    53/100
    • ECI134.1
    • Price$0.40 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  2. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2 Thinking

    Released Nov 6, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI146.0
    • Price$0.60 / $2.50
    • Context262K
  3. OpenAI

    GPT-4.1 mini

    Released Apr 14, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI135.0
    • Price$0.40 / $1.60
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (GPT-4.1 mini 60/100, Kimi K2 Thinking 58/100, Mistral Medium 3 53/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K2 Thinking for raw capability, GPT-4.1 mini on price and GPT-4.1 mini for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityKimi K2 ThinkingCapabilities Index (ECI): Kimi K2 Thinking 146.0 · GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 · Mistral Medium 3 134.1
  • Lowest priceGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 mini $0.70 · Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 · Kimi K2 Thinking $1.07 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 mini 1,047,576 · Kimi K2 Thinking 262,144 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-4.1 miniMistral Medium 3: Text, Images · Kimi K2 Thinking: Text · GPT-4.1 mini: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingKimi K2 ThinkingPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Medium 3Kimi K2 ThinkingGPT-4.1 mini
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%587359
Price25%544857
Inputs & features15%503570
Context window10%243761
Overall100%53/10058/10060/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Medium 3 vs Kimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-4.1 mini specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Medium 3Mistral AIKimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AIGPT-4.1 miniOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)134.1146.0 (best)135.0
ECI rank#117 of 148#72 of 148 (best)#115 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions59.5%84.2% (best)65.9%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics——6.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics32.2%83.1% (best)44.7%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions——12.7%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.40 (best)$0.60$0.40 (best)
Output$2.00$2.50$1.60 (best)
Cached input——$0.10
Blended (3:1)$0.80$1.07$0.70 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 10 providersOfficial OpenAI API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens1,047,576 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDmistral-medium-2505—gpt-4.1-mini
API providers51024 (best)
ReleasedMay 7, 2025Nov 6, 2025Apr 14, 2025
Knowledge cutoffMay 2025Aug 2024Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Medium 3$8.00
  • Kimi K2 Thinking$11.00
  • GPT-4.1 mini$7.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Medium 3, Kimi K2 Thinking or GPT-4.1 mini?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (GPT-4.1 mini 60/100, Kimi K2 Thinking 58/100, Mistral Medium 3 53/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K2 Thinking for raw capability, GPT-4.1 mini on price and GPT-4.1 mini for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3, Kimi K2 Thinking or GPT-4.1 mini?

GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper at $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.70 per million tokens for GPT-4.1 mini versus $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3 (1.1× as much) and $1.07 for Kimi K2 Thinking (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Kimi K2 Thinking scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Kimi K2 Thinking 146.0 (#72 of 148), GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 (#115 of 148) and Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (143.4–147.6 vs 131.2–136.6), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Kimi K2 Thinking 84.2%, GPT-4.1 mini 65.9%, Mistral Medium 3 59.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Kimi K2 Thinking 83.1%, GPT-4.1 mini 44.7%, Mistral Medium 3 32.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Medium 3, Kimi K2 Thinking and GPT-4.1 mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Kimi K2 Thinking leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 mini has the largest context window at 1,047,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Kimi K2 Thinking and 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3. Maximum output per response: Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072, Kimi K2 Thinking up to 262,144, GPT-4.1 mini up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images; Kimi K2 Thinking accepts text; GPT-4.1 mini accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-4.1 mini handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K2 Thinking publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Medium 3 and GPT-4.1 mini is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K2 Thinking is the newest, released Nov 6, 2025. Mistral Medium 3 came out May 7, 2025; GPT-4.1 mini came out Apr 14, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Medium 3 May 2025, Kimi K2 Thinking Aug 2024, GPT-4.1 mini Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.