ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Mistral Medium 3 vs DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-4.1 mini

GPT-4.1 mini comes out ahead, 60 to 54 and 53 on our weighted score, though DeepSeek V3 0324 is 42% cheaper per token.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Medium 3

    Released May 7, 2025

    53/100
    • ECI134.1
    • Price$0.40 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  2. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek V3 0324

    Released Mar 24, 2025

    54/100
    • ECI135.9
    • Price$0.24 / $0.90
    • Context164K
  3. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-4.1 mini

    Released Apr 14, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI135.0
    • Price$0.40 / $1.60
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

GPT-4.1 mini is our pick

GPT-4.1 mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against DeepSeek V3 0324 (54) and Mistral Medium 3 (53). It leads on inputs & features and context window. DeepSeek V3 0324 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityDeepSeek V3 0324Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9 · GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 · Mistral Medium 3 134.1
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek V3 0324 $0.405 · GPT-4.1 mini $0.70 · Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 mini 1,047,576 · DeepSeek V3 0324 163,840 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-4.1 miniMistral Medium 3: Text, Images · DeepSeek V3 0324: Text · GPT-4.1 mini: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek V3 0324Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Medium 3DeepSeek V3 0324GPT-4.1 mini
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%586059
Price25%546857
Inputs & features15%502570
Context window10%242861
Overall100%53/10054/10060/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Medium 3 vs DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-4.1 mini specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Medium 3Mistral AIDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeekGPT-4.1 miniOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)134.1135.9 (best)135.0
ECI rank#117 of 148#114 of 148 (best)#115 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions59.5%67.6% (best)65.9%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics——6.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics32.2%37.8%44.7% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions——12.7%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.40$0.24 (best)$0.40
Output$2.00$0.90 (best)$1.60
Cached input——$0.10
Blended (3:1)$0.80$0.405 (best)$0.70
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 5 providersOfficial OpenAI API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens163,840 tokens1,047,576 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens163,840 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDmistral-medium-2505—gpt-4.1-mini
API providers5524 (best)
ReleasedMay 7, 2025Mar 24, 2025Apr 14, 2025
Knowledge cutoffMay 2025—Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Medium 3$8.00
  • DeepSeek V3 0324$4.20
  • GPT-4.1 mini$7.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Medium 3, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-4.1 mini?

GPT-4.1 mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against DeepSeek V3 0324 (54) and Mistral Medium 3 (53). It leads on inputs & features and context window. DeepSeek V3 0324 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-4.1 mini?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is cheaper at $0.24 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). GPT-4.1 mini costs $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.405 per million tokens for DeepSeek V3 0324 versus $0.70 for GPT-4.1 mini (1.7× as much) and $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3 (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

DeepSeek V3 0324 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9 (#114 of 148), GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 (#115 of 148) and Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (132.4–138.0 vs 131.2–136.6), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — DeepSeek V3 0324 67.6%, GPT-4.1 mini 65.9%, Mistral Medium 3 59.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-4.1 mini 44.7%, DeepSeek V3 0324 37.8%, Mistral Medium 3 32.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Medium 3, DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4.1 mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, DeepSeek V3 0324 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 mini has the largest context window at 1,047,576 tokens, against 163,840 for DeepSeek V3 0324 and 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3. Maximum output per response: Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072, DeepSeek V3 0324 up to 163,840, GPT-4.1 mini up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images; DeepSeek V3 0324 accepts text; GPT-4.1 mini accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-4.1 mini handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek V3 0324 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Medium 3 and GPT-4.1 mini is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Medium 3 is the newest, released May 7, 2025. GPT-4.1 mini came out Apr 14, 2025; DeepSeek V3 0324 came out Mar 24, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Medium 3 May 2025, GPT-4.1 mini Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.