ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Mistral Large vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct vs Gemma 2 27B

Mistral Large comes out ahead, 45 to 39 and 28 on our weighted score, though Gemma 2 27B is 13% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Mistral Large

    Released Feb 26, 2024

    45/100
    • ECI122.0
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context128K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct

    Released Nov 12, 2024

    39/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.66 / $1.00
    • Context131K
  3. Google

    Gemma 2 27B

    Released Jul 13, 2024

    28/100
    • ECI122.1
    • Price$0.65 / $0.65
    • Context8K
01 — Verdict

Mistral Large is our pick

Mistral Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct (39) and Gemma 2 27B (28). It leads on inputs & features. Gemma 2 27B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemma 2 27BGemma 2 27B $0.65 · Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct $0.745 · Mistral Large $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructQwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 131,072 · Mistral Large 128,000 · Gemma 2 27B 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsMistral LargeMistral Large: Text, PDFs · Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct: Text · Gemma 2 27B: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and Gemma 2 27BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral LargeQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructGemma 2 27B
Price50%535456
Inputs & features30%45250
Context window20%24250
Overall100%45/10039/10028/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Large vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct vs Gemma 2 27B specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral LargeMistral AIQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructAlibaba (Qwen)Gemma 2 27BGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)122.0—122.1 (best)
ECI rank#153 of 165—#152 of 165 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions38.8% (best)—36.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics1.9% (best)—1.4%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50 (best)$0.66$0.65
Output$1.50$1.00$0.65 (best)
Cached input$0.05——
Blended (3:1)$0.75$0.745$0.65 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 7 providersMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Max output102,400 tokens (best)8,192 tokens2,048 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDmistral-large-latest——
API providers11 (best)73
ReleasedFeb 26, 2024Nov 12, 2024Jul 13, 2024
Knowledge cutoffNov 30, 2024—Jun 30, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Large$8.00
  • Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct$8.60
  • Gemma 2 27B$7.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Large, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct or Gemma 2 27B?

Mistral Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct (39) and Gemma 2 27B (28). It leads on inputs & features. Gemma 2 27B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct or Gemma 2 27B?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct costs $0.66 input / $1.00 output per million tokens (median across 7 API providers); Mistral Large costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.65 per million tokens for Gemma 2 27B versus $0.745 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct (1.1× as much) and $0.75 for Mistral Large (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Mistral Large has an ECI of 122.0, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct has not been scored yet and Gemma 2 27B has an ECI of 122.1.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Large, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and Gemma 2 27B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Gemma 2 27B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Mistral Large and 8,192 for Gemma 2 27B. Maximum output per response: Mistral Large up to 102,400, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct up to 8,192, Gemma 2 27B up to 2,048 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Large accepts text and PDFs; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct accepts text; Gemma 2 27B accepts text. Mistral Large handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and Gemma 2 27B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Large is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct is the newest, released Nov 12, 2024. Gemma 2 27B came out Jul 13, 2024; Mistral Large came out Feb 26, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large Nov 30, 2024, Gemma 2 27B Jun 30, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.