ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Mistral Large vs Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Gemma 2 27B

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct comes out ahead, 49 to 44 and 35 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large

    Released Feb 26, 2024

    44/100
    • ECI122.0
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context128K
  2. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    49/100
    • ECI116.4
    • Price$0.06 / $0.08
    • Context128K
  3. Google

    Gemma 2 27B

    Released Jul 13, 2024

    35/100
    • ECI122.1
    • Price$0.65 / $0.65
    • Context8K
01 — Verdict

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is our pick

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Mistral Large (44) and Gemma 2 27B (35). It leads on price. Mistral Large wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemma 2 27BCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 2 27B 122.1 · Mistral Large 122.0 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 116.4
  • Lowest priceLlama-3.1-8B-InstructLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.065 · Gemma 2 27B $0.65 · Mistral Large $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMistral Large and Llama-3.1-8B-InstructMistral Large 128,000 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 · Gemma 2 27B 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsMistral LargeMistral Large: Text, PDFs · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text · Gemma 2 27B: Text
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Gemma 2 27BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral LargeLlama-3.1-8B-InstructGemma 2 27B
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%423542
Price25%5310056
Inputs & features15%45250
Context window10%24240
Overall100%44/10049/10035/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Large vs Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Gemma 2 27B specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral LargeMistral AILlama-3.1-8B-InstructMetaGemma 2 27BGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)122.0116.4122.1 (best)
ECI rank#153 of 165#162 of 165#152 of 165 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions38.8% (best)27.0%36.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics1.9% (best)1.7%1.4%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50$0.06 (best)$0.65
Output$1.50$0.08 (best)$0.65
Cached input$0.05——
Blended (3:1)$0.75$0.065 (best)$0.65
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 17 providersMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Max output102,400 tokens (best)4,096 tokens2,048 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDmistral-large-latest——
API providers1118 (best)3
ReleasedFeb 26, 2024Jul 23, 2024Jul 13, 2024
Knowledge cutoffNov 30, 2024Dec 2023Jun 30, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Large$8.00
  • Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$0.76
  • Gemma 2 27B$7.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Large, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct or Gemma 2 27B?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Mistral Large (44) and Gemma 2 27B (35). It leads on price. Mistral Large wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct or Gemma 2 27B?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.08 output per million tokens (median across 17 API providers). Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); Mistral Large costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.065 per million tokens for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct versus $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B (10× as much) and $0.75 for Mistral Large (12× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 2 27B 122.1 (#152 of 165), Mistral Large 122.0 (#153 of 165) and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 116.4 (#162 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (115.8–124.1 vs 115.7–124.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Large 38.8%, Gemma 2 27B 36.5%, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Mistral Large 1.9%, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 1.7%, Gemma 2 27B 1.4%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Large, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Gemma 2 27B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemma 2 27B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Note that Gemma 2 27B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct have the largest context windows (128,000 and 128,000 tokens), against 8,192 for Gemma 2 27B. Maximum output per response: Mistral Large up to 102,400, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096, Gemma 2 27B up to 2,048 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Large accepts text and PDFs; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text; Gemma 2 27B accepts text. Mistral Large handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Gemma 2 27B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Large is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is the newest, released Jul 23, 2024. Gemma 2 27B came out Jul 13, 2024; Mistral Large came out Feb 26, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large Nov 30, 2024, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023, Gemma 2 27B Jun 30, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.