ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8 27B vs Inkling Small

Too close to call on our weighted score (Inkling Small 68, Mistral Large 4 67, Qwen3.8 27B 66). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 4

    Released Oct 6, 2026NewBeta

    67/100
    • ECI150.6
    • Price$0.70 / $2.10
    • Context1.05M
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 27B

    Released Aug 14, 2026

    66/100
    • ECI151.8
    • Price$0.40 / $2.55
    • Context262K
  3. Thinking Machines

    Inkling Small

    Released Jul 30, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI150.5
    • Price$0.58 / $1.44
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Inkling Small 68/100, Mistral Large 4 67/100, Qwen3.8 27B 66/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 27B for raw capability and Inkling Small on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityQwen3.8 27BCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.8 27B 151.8 · Mistral Large 4 150.6 · Inkling Small 150.5
  • Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.795 · Qwen3.8 27B $0.938 · Mistral Large 4 $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMistral Large 4 and Inkling SmallMistral Large 4 1,048,576 · Inkling Small 1,048,576 · Qwen3.8 27B 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.8 27B and Inkling SmallMistral Large 4: Text, Images · Qwen3.8 27B: Text, Images, Video · Inkling Small: Text, Images, Audio
  • Self-hostingQwen3.8 27B and Inkling SmallPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Large 4Qwen3.8 27BInkling Small
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%777977
Price25%474952
Inputs & features15%707070
Context window10%613761
Overall100%67/10066/10068/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8 27B vs Inkling Small specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Large 4Mistral AIQwen3.8 27BAlibaba (Qwen)Inkling SmallThinking Machines
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)150.6151.8 (best)150.5
ECI rank#57 of 165#54 of 165 (best)#58 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions88.1%—88.5% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics58.6% (best)—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics98.3% (best)—90.0%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions20.0% (best)—19.1%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.70$0.40 (best)$0.58
Output$2.10$2.55$1.44 (best)
Cached input$0.07 (best)—$0.116
Blended (3:1)$1.05$0.938$0.795 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 49 providersOfficial Thinking Machines API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output262,144 tokens32,768 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highYesYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpenApache-2.0
API model IDmistral-large-4—thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small
API providers1553 (best)12
ReleasedOct 6, 2026Aug 14, 2026Jul 30, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Large 4$11.20
  • Qwen3.8 27B$9.10
  • Inkling Small$8.68
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Large 4, Qwen3.8 27B or Inkling Small?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Inkling Small 68/100, Mistral Large 4 67/100, Qwen3.8 27B 66/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 27B for raw capability and Inkling Small on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 4, Qwen3.8 27B or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.58 input / $1.44 output per million tokens (official Thinking Machines API price). Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.40 input / $2.55 output per million tokens (median across 49 API providers); Mistral Large 4 costs $0.70 input / $2.10 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.795 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $0.938 for Qwen3.8 27B (1.2× as much) and $1.05 for Mistral Large 4 (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.8 27B 151.8 (#54 of 165), Mistral Large 4 150.6 (#57 of 165) and Inkling Small 150.5 (#58 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (149.9–153.6 vs 147.4–153.5), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Large 4, Qwen3.8 27B and Inkling Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.8 27B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 4 and Inkling Small have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 262,144 for Qwen3.8 27B. Maximum output per response: Mistral Large 4 up to 262,144, Qwen3.8 27B up to 32,768, Inkling Small up to 1,048,576 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Large 4 accepts text and images; Qwen3.8 27B accepts text, images and video; Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio. Qwen3.8 27B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3.8 27B and Inkling Small publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Mistral Large 4 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Large 4 is the newest, released Oct 6, 2026. Qwen3.8 27B came out Aug 14, 2026; Inkling Small came out Jul 30, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.