ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Mistral Large 3 vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base vs Qwen3.5 9B Base

Too close to call on our weighted score (Mistral Large 3 52, Qwen3.5 9B Base 50, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 45). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 3

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context262K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base

    Released Feb 24, 2026

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.54 / $1.33
    • Context262K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 9B Base

    Released Feb 26, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $0.807
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Mistral Large 3 52/100, Qwen3.5 9B Base 50/100, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 45/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.5 9B Base on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.5 9B BaseQwen3.5 9B Base $0.427 · Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base $0.739 · Mistral Large 3 $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameMistral Large 3 262,144 · Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 262,144 · Qwen3.5 9B Base 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Qwen3.5 9B BaseMistral Large 3: Text, Images · Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3.5 9B Base: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Large 3Qwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseQwen3.5 9B Base
Price50%535465
Inputs & features30%603535
Context window20%373737
Overall100%52/10045/10050/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Large 3 vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base vs Qwen3.5 9B Base specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Large 3Mistral AIQwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 9B BaseAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50$0.54$0.30 (best)
Output$1.50$1.33$0.807 (best)
Cached input$0.05——
Blended (3:1)$0.75$0.739$0.427 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 1 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output262,144 tokens (best)65,536 tokens65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesNoNo
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenApache-2.0OpenApache-2.0
API model IDmistral-large-2512——
API providers17 (best)11
ReleasedDec 2, 2025Feb 24, 2026Feb 26, 2026
Knowledge cutoffNov 2024——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Large 3$8.00
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base$8.07
  • Qwen3.5 9B Base$4.61
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Large 3, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base or Qwen3.5 9B Base?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Mistral Large 3 52/100, Qwen3.5 9B Base 50/100, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 45/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.5 9B Base on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 3, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base or Qwen3.5 9B Base?

Qwen3.5 9B Base is cheaper at $0.30 input / $0.807 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base costs $0.54 input / $1.33 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Mistral Large 3 costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.427 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 9B Base versus $0.739 for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base (1.7× as much) and $0.75 for Mistral Large 3 (1.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base has not been scored yet and Qwen3.5 9B Base has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Large 3, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Qwen3.5 9B Base yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Qwen3.5 9B Base does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 3, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Qwen3.5 9B Base share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base up to 65,536, Qwen3.5 9B Base up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images; Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base accepts text, images and video; Qwen3.5 9B Base accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.5 9B Base is the newest, released Feb 26, 2026. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base came out Feb 24, 2026; Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.