Mistral Large 2.1 vs Mistral Large
Mistral Large comes out ahead, 44 to 38 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2.1
38/100- ECI128.6
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context131K
- Our pick
Mistral AI
Mistral Large
44/100- ECI122.0
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Mistral Large is our pick
Mistral Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Mistral Large 2.1 (38). It leads on price and inputs & features. Mistral Large 2.1 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityMistral Large 2.1Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Large 2.1 128.6 · Mistral Large 122.0
- Lowest priceMistral LargeMistral Large $0.75 · Mistral Large 2.1 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMistral Large 2.1Mistral Large 2.1 131,072 · Mistral Large 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsMistral LargeMistral Large 2.1: Text · Mistral Large: Text, PDFs
- Self-hostingMistral Large 2.1Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Mistral Large 2.1 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 50 | 42 |
| Price | 25% | 26 | 53 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 25 | 45 |
| Context window | 10% | 25 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 38/100 | 44/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 128.6 (best) | 122.0 |
| ECI rank | #142 of 165 (best) | #153 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 51.3% (best) | 38.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 7.8% (best) | 1.9% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $0.50 (best) |
| Output | $6.00 | $1.50 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.05 |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 | $0.75 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 102,400 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | mistral-large-latest |
| API providers | 2 | 11 (best) |
| Released | Nov 18, 2024 | Feb 26, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Nov 2024 | Nov 30, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Mistral Large 2.1$32.00
Mistral Large$8.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Mistral Large 2.1 or Mistral Large?
Mistral Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Mistral Large 2.1 (38). It leads on price and inputs & features. Mistral Large 2.1 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 2.1 or Mistral Large?
Mistral Large is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Mistral Large 2.1 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.75 per million tokens for Mistral Large versus $3.00 for Mistral Large 2.1 (4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Mistral Large 2.1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Large 2.1 128.6 (#142 of 165) and Mistral Large 122.0 (#153 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (124.3–130.7 vs 115.7–124.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Large 2.1 51.3%, Mistral Large 38.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Mistral Large 2.1 7.8%, Mistral Large 1.9%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Large 2.1 and Mistral Large yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Large 2.1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 2.1 has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Mistral Large. Maximum output per response: Mistral Large 2.1 up to 16,384, Mistral Large up to 102,400 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Mistral Large 2.1 accepts text; Mistral Large accepts text and PDFs. Mistral Large handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Mistral Large 2.1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Large is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Mistral Large 2.1 is the newest, released Nov 18, 2024. Mistral Large came out Feb 26, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 2.1 Nov 2024, Mistral Large Nov 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.