Ministral 3 3B vs Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)
Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) 72, Ministral 3 3B 72). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Mistral AIMinistral 3 3B
72/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.10
- Context262K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)
72/100- ECI—
- Price$0.022 / $0.215
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) 72/100, Ministral 3 3B 72/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) $0.07 · Ministral 3 3B $0.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameMinistral 3 3B 262,144 · Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMinistral 3 3B: Text, Images · Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud): Text, Images
- Self-hostingMinistral 3 3BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Ministral 3 3B | Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 93 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ministral 3 3BMistral AI | Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Alibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.10 | $0.022 (best) |
| Output | $0.10 (best) | $0.215 |
| Cached input | $0.01 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.10 | $0.07 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | ministral-3b-2512 | — |
| API providers | 11 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Dec 2, 2025 | Oct 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ministral 3 3B$1.20
- Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)$0.65
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ministral 3 3B or Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) 72/100, Ministral 3 3B 72/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 3B or Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)?
Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is cheaper at $0.022 input / $0.215 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Ministral 3 3B costs $0.10 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.07 per million tokens for Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) versus $0.10 for Ministral 3 3B (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Ministral 3 3B has not been scored yet and Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ministral 3 3B and Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ministral 3 3B and Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Ministral 3 3B up to 262,144, Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ministral 3 3B accepts text and images; Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Ministral 3 3B publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Ministral 3 3B is the newest, released Dec 2, 2025. Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) came out Oct 15, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BThree-way comparison
- Ministral 3 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
- Ministral 3 3B vs Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed
- Ministral 3 3B vs Granite-4.0-H-SmallIBM
- Ministral 3 3B vs Trinity MiniArcee AI
- Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) vs Trinity MiniArcee AI
- Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) vs Baichuan M2 32BBaichuan
