ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Ministral 3 14B vs Seed 2.0 Lite vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Too close to call on our weighted score (Seed 2.0 Lite 73, Grok 4.1 Fast 71, Ministral 3 14B 63). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Ministral 3 14B

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    63/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.268 / $0.325
    • Context262K
  2. ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.0 Lite

    Released Feb 14, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.089 / $0.534
    • Context256K
  3. xAI

    Grok 4.1 Fast

    Released Nov 19, 2025

    71/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $0.50
    • Context2M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Seed 2.0 Lite 73/100, Grok 4.1 Fast 71/100, Ministral 3 14B 63/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Seed 2.0 Lite on price and Grok 4.1 Fast for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite $0.20 · Grok 4.1 Fast $0.275 · Ministral 3 14B $0.282 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGrok 4.1 FastGrok 4.1 Fast 2,000,000 · Ministral 3 14B 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Lite 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteMinistral 3 14B: Text, Images · Seed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video · Grok 4.1 Fast: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingMinistral 3 14BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMinistral 3 14BSeed 2.0 LiteGrok 4.1 Fast
Price50%768376
Inputs & features30%608060
Context window20%373672
Overall100%63/10073/10071/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Ministral 3 14B vs Seed 2.0 Lite vs Grok 4.1 Fast specifications side by side
SpecificationMinistral 3 14BMistral AISeed 2.0 LiteByteDance SeedGrok 4.1 FastxAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.268$0.089 (best)$0.20
Output$0.325 (best)$0.534$0.50
Cached input—$0.018—
Blended (3:1)$0.282$0.20 (best)$0.275
Long-context rateSame rateOver 32K: $0.134 / $0.802Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersOfficial Volcengine Ark APIMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens256,000 tokens2,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output262,144 tokens (best)32,000 tokens30,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningNoYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenApache 2.0ProprietaryProprietary
API model ID—doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428—
API providers26 (best)2
ReleasedDec 2, 2025Feb 14, 2026Nov 19, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Ministral 3 14B$3.33
  • Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
  • Grok 4.1 Fast$3.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Ministral 3 14B, Seed 2.0 Lite or Grok 4.1 Fast?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Seed 2.0 Lite 73/100, Grok 4.1 Fast 71/100, Ministral 3 14B 63/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Seed 2.0 Lite on price and Grok 4.1 Fast for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B, Seed 2.0 Lite or Grok 4.1 Fast?

Seed 2.0 Lite is cheaper at $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Grok 4.1 Fast costs $0.20 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Ministral 3 14B costs $0.268 input / $0.325 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Seed 2.0 Lite versus $0.275 for Grok 4.1 Fast (1.4× as much) and $0.282 for Ministral 3 14B (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Ministral 3 14B has not been scored yet, Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet and Grok 4.1 Fast has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ministral 3 14B, Seed 2.0 Lite and Grok 4.1 Fast yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.1 Fast has the largest context window at 2,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Ministral 3 14B and 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Lite. Maximum output per response: Ministral 3 14B up to 262,144, Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000, Grok 4.1 Fast up to 30,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Ministral 3 14B accepts text and images; Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video; Grok 4.1 Fast accepts text and images. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Ministral 3 14B publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite and Grok 4.1 Fast is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Seed 2.0 Lite is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Ministral 3 14B came out Dec 2, 2025; Grok 4.1 Fast came out Nov 19, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.