ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Ministral 14B vs Qwen3 30B A3B vs Rnj-1 Instruct

Ministral 14B comes out ahead, 63 to 55 and 50 on our weighted score, though Rnj-1 Instruct is 14% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Ministral 14B

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    63/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.175 / $0.175
    • Context262K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 30B A3B

    Released Apr 28, 2025

    55/100
    • ECI136.2
    • Price$0.108 / $0.475
    • Context131K
  3. Essential AI

    Rnj-1 Instruct

    Released Dec 4, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

Ministral 14B is our pick

Ministral 14B is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Qwen3 30B A3B (55) and Rnj-1 Instruct (50). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Rnj-1 Instruct wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceRnj-1 InstructRnj-1 Instruct $0.15 · Ministral 14B $0.175 · Qwen3 30B A3B $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMinistral 14BMinistral 14B 262,144 · Qwen3 30B A3B 131,072 · Rnj-1 Instruct 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsMinistral 14BMinistral 14B: Text, Images · Qwen3 30B A3B: Text · Rnj-1 Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMinistral 14BQwen3 30B A3BRnj-1 Instruct
Price50%828085
Inputs & features30%503525
Context window20%37250
Overall100%63/10055/10050/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Ministral 14B vs Qwen3 30B A3B vs Rnj-1 Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationMinistral 14BMistral AIQwen3 30B A3BAlibaba (Qwen)Rnj-1 InstructEssential AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—136.2—
ECI rank—#126 of 165—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—61.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—62.8%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.175$0.108 (best)$0.15
Output$0.175$0.475$0.15 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.175$0.20$0.15 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersMedian of 14 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Max output262,144 tokens (best)16,384 tokens32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0OpenOpenApache 2.0
API model ID———
API providers214 (best)1
ReleasedDec 2, 2025Apr 28, 2025Dec 4, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Ministral 14B$2.10
  • Qwen3 30B A3B$2.03
  • Rnj-1 Instruct$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Ministral 14B, Qwen3 30B A3B or Rnj-1 Instruct?

Ministral 14B is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Qwen3 30B A3B (55) and Rnj-1 Instruct (50). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Rnj-1 Instruct wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 14B, Qwen3 30B A3B or Rnj-1 Instruct?

Rnj-1 Instruct is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Ministral 14B costs $0.175 input / $0.175 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.108 input / $0.475 output per million tokens (median across 14 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Rnj-1 Instruct versus $0.175 for Ministral 14B (1.2× as much) and $0.20 for Qwen3 30B A3B (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Ministral 14B has not been scored yet, Qwen3 30B A3B has an ECI of 136.2 and Rnj-1 Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ministral 14B, Qwen3 30B A3B and Rnj-1 Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 14B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3 30B A3B and 32,768 for Rnj-1 Instruct. Maximum output per response: Ministral 14B up to 262,144, Qwen3 30B A3B up to 16,384, Rnj-1 Instruct up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Ministral 14B accepts text and images; Qwen3 30B A3B accepts text; Rnj-1 Instruct accepts text. Ministral 14B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache-2.0 and Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Rnj-1 Instruct is the newest, released Dec 4, 2025. Ministral 14B came out Dec 2, 2025; Qwen3 30B A3B came out Apr 28, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.