MiniMax-M2 Her vs Mistral Large 3 vs DeepSeek OCR 2
Mistral Large 3 comes out ahead, 52 to 43 and 38 on our weighted score, though MiniMax-M2 Her is 30% cheaper per token.
MiniMax
MiniMax-M2 Her
43/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context66K
- Our pick
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context262K
DeepSeek
DeepSeek OCR 2
38/100- ECI—
- Price$0.46 / $0.749
- Context8K
Mistral Large 3 is our pick
Mistral Large 3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against MiniMax-M2 Her (43) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (38). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiniMax-M2 HerMiniMax-M2 Her $0.525 · DeepSeek OCR 2 $0.532 · Mistral Large 3 $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMistral Large 3Mistral Large 3 262,144 · MiniMax-M2 Her 65,536 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsMistral Large 3 and DeepSeek OCR 2MiniMax-M2 Her: Text · Mistral Large 3: Text, Images · DeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images
- Self-hostingMistral Large 3 and DeepSeek OCR 2Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MiniMax-M2 Her | Mistral Large 3 | DeepSeek OCR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 60 | 53 | 60 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 60 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 12 | 37 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 43/100 | 52/100 | 38/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.30 (best) | $0.50 | $0.46 |
| Output | $1.20 | $1.50 | $0.749 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.05 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.525 (best) | $0.75 | $0.532 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Official Mistral API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 65,536 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Max output | 2,048 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | mistral-large-2512 | — |
| API providers | 3 | 17 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Jan 23, 2026 | Dec 2, 2025 | Jan 27, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Nov 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
MiniMax-M2 Her$5.40
Mistral Large 3$8.00
DeepSeek OCR 2$6.10
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiniMax-M2 Her, Mistral Large 3 or DeepSeek OCR 2?
Mistral Large 3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against MiniMax-M2 Her (43) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (38). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2 Her, Mistral Large 3 or DeepSeek OCR 2?
MiniMax-M2 Her is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). DeepSeek OCR 2 costs $0.46 input / $0.749 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Mistral Large 3 costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for MiniMax-M2 Her versus $0.532 for DeepSeek OCR 2 (1× as much) and $0.75 for Mistral Large 3 (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2 Her has not been scored yet, Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet and DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2 Her, Mistral Large 3 and DeepSeek OCR 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 3 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 65,536 for MiniMax-M2 Her and 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2 Her up to 2,048, Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144, DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiniMax-M2 Her accepts text; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images; DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images. Mistral Large 3 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Mistral Large 3 and DeepSeek OCR 2 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; MiniMax-M2 Her is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek OCR 2 is the newest, released Jan 27, 2026. MiniMax-M2 Her came out Jan 23, 2026; Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.