MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs DeepSeek OCR 2
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview comes out ahead, 50 to 41 and 32 on our weighted score, though DeepSeek OCR 2 is 48% cheaper per token.
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
- Our pick
GoogleGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview
50/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context131K
DeepSeekDeepSeek OCR 2
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.89 / $1.47
- Context8K
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is our pick
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (32). It leads on inputs & features. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceDeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek OCR 2 $1.03 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed $1.05 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 204,800 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed: Text · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video · DeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images
- Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and DeepSeek OCR 2Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview | DeepSeek OCR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 36 | 49 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 90 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 41/100 | 50/100 | 32/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle | DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 (best) | $1.00 | $0.89 |
| Output | $2.40 | $5.00 | $1.47 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.06 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.05 | $2.00 | $1.03 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API | Median of 1 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 204,800 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | — | — |
| API providers | 7 (best) | 1 | 2 |
| Released | Feb 13, 2026 | Apr 14, 2026 | Jan 27, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed$10.80
- Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
- DeepSeek OCR 2$11.83
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview or DeepSeek OCR 2?
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (32). It leads on inputs & features. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview or DeepSeek OCR 2?
DeepSeek OCR 2 is cheaper at $0.89 input / $1.47 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price); Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.03 per million tokens for DeepSeek OCR 2 versus $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (1× as much) and $2.00 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (1.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has not been scored yet, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet and DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and DeepSeek OCR 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has the largest context window at 204,800 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed up to 131,072, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536, DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed accepts text; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video; DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and DeepSeek OCR 2 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the newest, released Apr 14, 2026. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed came out Feb 13, 2026; DeepSeek OCR 2 came out Jan 27, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Nova 2 LiteAmazon
- Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs GLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
