MiMo-V2-Flash vs Ministral 3 8B vs Rnj-1 Instruct
Ministral 3 8B comes out ahead, 68 to 60 and 50 on our weighted score.
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Flash
60/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.30
- Context262K
- Our pick
Mistral AIMinistral 3 8B
68/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context262K
Essential AI
Rnj-1 Instruct
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context33K
Ministral 3 8B is our pick
Ministral 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against MiMo-V2-Flash (60) and Rnj-1 Instruct (50). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSame priceMiMo-V2-Flash $0.15 · Ministral 3 8B $0.15 · Rnj-1 Instruct $0.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2-Flash and Ministral 3 8BMiMo-V2-Flash 262,144 · Ministral 3 8B 262,144 · Rnj-1 Instruct 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsMinistral 3 8BMiMo-V2-Flash: Text · Ministral 3 8B: Text, Images · Rnj-1 Instruct: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2-Flash | Ministral 3 8B | Rnj-1 Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 85 | 85 | 85 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 60 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 60/100 | 68/100 | 50/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2-FlashXiaomi | Ministral 3 8BMistral AI | Rnj-1 InstructEssential AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Output | $0.30 | $0.15 (best) | $0.15 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.015 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15 | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Official Mistral API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | OpenApache 2.0 | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | — | ministral-8b-2512 | — |
| API providers | 4 | 11 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Dec 16, 2025 | Dec 2, 2025 | Dec 4, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 1, 2024 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2-Flash$1.60
- Ministral 3 8B$1.80
- Rnj-1 Instruct$1.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2-Flash, Ministral 3 8B or Rnj-1 Instruct?
Ministral 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against MiMo-V2-Flash (60) and Rnj-1 Instruct (50). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash, Ministral 3 8B or Rnj-1 Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Flash, Ministral 3 8B and Rnj-1 Instruct cost the same: $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiMo-V2-Flash has not been scored yet, Ministral 3 8B has not been scored yet and Rnj-1 Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2-Flash, Ministral 3 8B and Rnj-1 Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Flash and Ministral 3 8B have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 32,768 for Rnj-1 Instruct. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2-Flash up to 65,536, Ministral 3 8B up to 262,144, Rnj-1 Instruct up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2-Flash accepts text; Ministral 3 8B accepts text and images; Rnj-1 Instruct accepts text. Ministral 3 8B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the newest, released Dec 16, 2025. Rnj-1 Instruct came out Dec 4, 2025; Ministral 3 8B came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Flash Dec 1, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
