MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Ornith 1.5 35B A3B vs Seed Character
MiMo-V2.6-Flash comes out ahead, 80 to 73 and 66 on our weighted score, though Seed Character is 7% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Flash
80/100- ECI—
- Price$0.14 / $0.28
- Context1.05M
DeepReinforce
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B
66/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context262K
ByteDance SeedSeed Character
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.119 / $0.297
- Context256K
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is our pick
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Seed Character (73) and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (66). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSeed CharacterSeed Character $0.163 · MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.175 · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash 1,048,576 · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B 262,144 · Seed Character 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B: Text, Images · Seed Character: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingMiMo-V2.6-Flash and Ornith 1.5 35B A3BPublishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ornith 1.5 35B A3B | Seed Character |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 82 | 82 | 84 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 90 | 60 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 37 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 80/100 | 66/100 | 73/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi | Ornith 1.5 35B A3BDeepReinforce | Seed CharacterByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.14 | $0.10 (best) | $0.119 |
| Output | $0.28 (best) | $0.40 | $0.297 |
| Cached input | $0.0028 (best) | — | $0.024 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 | $0.175 | $0.163 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.178 / $0.891 |
| Price source | Official Xiaomi API | Median of 1 providers | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | — | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yesminimal · low · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | OpenMIT | Proprietary |
| API model ID | mimo-v2.6-flash | — | doubao-seed-character-260628 |
| API providers | 23 (best) | 1 | 3 |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Aug 18, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash$1.96
- Ornith 1.5 35B A3B$1.80
- Seed Character$1.78
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Ornith 1.5 35B A3B or Seed Character?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Seed Character (73) and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (66). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Ornith 1.5 35B A3B or Seed Character?
Seed Character is cheaper at $0.119 input / $0.297 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price); Ornith 1.5 35B A3B costs $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.163 per million tokens for Seed Character versus $0.175 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash (1.1× as much) and $0.175 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has not been scored yet, Ornith 1.5 35B A3B has not been scored yet and Seed Character has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Ornith 1.5 35B A3B and Seed Character yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B and 256,000 for Seed Character. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.6-Flash up to 131,072, Seed Character up to 256,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts text, images, audio and video; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B accepts text and images; Seed Character accepts text, images and video. MiMo-V2.6-Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Seed Character is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the newest, released Sep 22, 2026. Ornith 1.5 35B A3B came out Aug 18, 2026; Seed Character came out Jun 23, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
