MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Seed 2.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 50 and 43 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
XiaomiMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed
43/100- ECI—
- Price$1.30 / $2.61
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $1.50
- Context1.05M
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.1 Pro
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.891 / $4.45
- Context256K
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is our pick
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Seed 2.1 Pro (50) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed (43). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.563 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed $1.63 · Seed 2.1 Pro $1.78 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed and Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 1,048,576 · Seed 2.1 Pro 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Seed 2.1 Pro: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Seed 2.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 40 | 62 | 38 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 100 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 61 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 43/100 | 73/100 | 50/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomi | Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.30 | $0.25 (best) | $0.891 |
| Output | $2.61 | $1.50 (best) | $4.45 |
| Cached input | $0.011 (best) | $0.025 | $0.178 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.63 | $0.563 (best) | $1.78 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Xiaomi API | Official Google API | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 65,536 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | mimo-v2.5-pro-ultraspeed | gemini-3.1-flash-lite | doubao-seed-2-1-pro-260628 |
| API providers | 1 | 23 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Jun 8, 2026 | May 7, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | Jan 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed$18.27
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$5.50
- Seed 2.1 Pro$17.81
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Seed 2.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Seed 2.1 Pro (50) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed (43). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Seed 2.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed costs $1.30 input / $2.61 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price); Seed 2.1 Pro costs $0.891 input / $4.45 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.563 per million tokens for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite versus $1.63 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed (2.9× as much) and $1.78 for Seed 2.1 Pro (3.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has not been scored yet and Seed 2.1 Pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Seed 2.1 Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 256,000 for Seed 2.1 Pro. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite up to 65,536, Seed 2.1 Pro up to 256,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Seed 2.1 Pro accepts text, images and video. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Seed 2.1 Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.1 Pro is the newest, released Jun 23, 2026. MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed came out Jun 8, 2026; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite came out May 7, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed Dec 2024, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Sakana NamazuSakana AI
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs LongCat-2.0Meituan (LongCat)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Ornith 1.5 35B A3BDeepReinforce
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIA
