MAI-Code-1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed comes out ahead, 45 to 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
MicrosoftMAI-Code-1-Flash
41/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context256K
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed
45/100- ECI—
- Price$1.30 / $2.61
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is our pick
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against MAI-Code-1-Flash (41). It leads on context window. MAI-Code-1-Flash wins on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed $1.63 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · MAI-Code-1-Flash unpriced
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 · MAI-Code-1-Flash 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMAI-Code-1-Flash: Text · MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text
- Self-hostingMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MAI-Code-1-Flash | MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 45 | 35 |
| Context window | 40% | 36 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 41/100 | 45/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MAI-Code-1-FlashMicrosoft | MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomi |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $1.30 |
| Output | — | $2.61 |
| Cached input | — | $0.011 |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $1.63 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Xiaomi API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | mimo-v2.5-pro-ultraspeed |
| API providers | — | 1 |
| Released | Jun 2, 2026 | Jun 8, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2025 | Dec 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MAI-Code-1-Flash—
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed$18.27
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MAI-Code-1-Flash or MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against MAI-Code-1-Flash (41). It leads on context window. MAI-Code-1-Flash wins on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MAI-Code-1-Flash or MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is cheaper at $1.30 input / $2.61 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.63 per million tokens for MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed versus . MAI-Code-1-Flash has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MAI-Code-1-Flash has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MAI-Code-1-Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 256,000 for MAI-Code-1-Flash. Maximum output per response: MAI-Code-1-Flash up to 128,000, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MAI-Code-1-Flash accepts text; MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; MAI-Code-1-Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is the newest, released Jun 8, 2026. MAI-Code-1-Flash came out Jun 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MAI-Code-1-Flash Dec 2025, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed Dec 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Nex-N2-ProThree-way comparison
- MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Nex-N2-ProNex AGI
- MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
- MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Claude Mythos 5Anthropic
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Sakana NamazuSakana AI
