ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Magistral Small vs Mistral Medium 3

Too close to call on our weighted score (Mistral Medium 3 53, Magistral Small 50). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Magistral Small

    Released Jun 10, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI133.2
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context131K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Medium 3

    Released May 7, 2025

    53/100
    • ECI134.1
    • Price$0.40 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Mistral Medium 3 53/100, Magistral Small 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Medium 3 for raw capability and Magistral Small on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMistral Medium 3Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Medium 3 134.1 · Magistral Small 133.2
  • Lowest priceMagistral SmallMagistral Small $0.75 · Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameMagistral Small 131,072 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsMistral Medium 3Magistral Small: Text · Mistral Medium 3: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingMagistral SmallPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMagistral SmallMistral Medium 3
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%5758
Price25%5654
Inputs & features15%3550
Context window10%2424
Overall100%50/10053/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Magistral Small vs Mistral Medium 3 specifications side by side
SpecificationMagistral SmallMistral AIMistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)133.2134.1 (best)
ECI rank#120 of 148#117 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions56.1%59.5% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics30.0%32.2% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50$0.40 (best)
Output$1.50 (best)$2.00
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.75 (best)$0.80
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache 2.0Proprietary
API model ID—mistral-medium-2505
API providers15 (best)
ReleasedJun 10, 2025May 7, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—May 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Magistral Small$8.00
  • Mistral Medium 3$8.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Magistral Small or Mistral Medium 3?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Mistral Medium 3 53/100, Magistral Small 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Medium 3 for raw capability and Magistral Small on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or Mistral Medium 3?

Magistral Small is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.75 per million tokens for Magistral Small versus $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3 (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Mistral Medium 3 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148) and Magistral Small 133.2 (#120 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (130.5–135.6 vs 128.9–134.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Medium 3 59.5%, Magistral Small 56.1%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Mistral Medium 3 32.2%, Magistral Small 30.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Magistral Small and Mistral Medium 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Medium 3 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Magistral Small and Mistral Medium 3 share the same 131,072-token context window. Maximum output per response: Magistral Small up to 8,192, Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Magistral Small accepts text; Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images. Mistral Medium 3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Magistral Small publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Mistral Medium 3 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Magistral Small is the newest, released Jun 10, 2025. Mistral Medium 3 came out May 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Medium 3 May 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.