Macaron V1 Venti vs Claude Mythos 5 vs Hy4 preview
Too close to call on our weighted score (Macaron V1 Venti 44, Hy4 preview 44, Claude Mythos 5 33). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Mindlab
Macaron V1 Venti
44/100- ECI—
- Price$0.825 / $2.48
- Context1.05M
AnthropicClaude Mythos 5
33/100- ECI—
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1M
TencentHy4 preview
44/100- ECI—
- Price$0.834 / $2.50
- Context1.02M
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Macaron V1 Venti 44/100, Hy4 preview 44/100, Claude Mythos 5 33/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Macaron V1 Venti on price and Macaron V1 Venti for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMacaron V1 VentiMacaron V1 Venti $1.24 · Hy4 preview $1.25 · Claude Mythos 5 $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMacaron V1 VentiMacaron V1 Venti 1,048,576 · Hy4 preview 1,024,000 · Claude Mythos 5 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Mythos 5Macaron V1 Venti: Text · Claude Mythos 5: Text, Images, PDFs · Hy4 preview: Text
- Self-hostingMacaron V1 Venti and Hy4 previewPublishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | Macaron V1 Venti | Claude Mythos 5 | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 44 | 0 | 43 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 44/100 | 33/100 | 44/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Macaron V1 VentiMindlab | Claude Mythos 5Anthropic | Hy4 previewTencent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.825 (best) | $10.00 | $0.834 |
| Output | $2.48 (best) | $50.00 | $2.50 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.042 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.24 (best) | $20.00 | $1.25 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 2 providers | Official Tencent TokenHub API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,024,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 64,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yeshigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenMIT | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | hy4-preview |
| API providers | 1 | 2 | 17 (best) |
| Released | Jul 21, 2026 | Jun 9, 2026 | Aug 28, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 31, 2026 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Macaron V1 Venti$13.20
- Claude Mythos 5$200.00
- Hy4 preview$13.34
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Macaron V1 Venti, Claude Mythos 5 or Hy4 preview?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Macaron V1 Venti 44/100, Hy4 preview 44/100, Claude Mythos 5 33/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Macaron V1 Venti on price and Macaron V1 Venti for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Macaron V1 Venti, Claude Mythos 5 or Hy4 preview?
Macaron V1 Venti is cheaper at $0.825 input / $2.48 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Hy4 preview costs $0.834 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Tencent TokenHub API price); Claude Mythos 5 costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.24 per million tokens for Macaron V1 Venti versus $1.25 for Hy4 preview (1× as much) and $20.00 for Claude Mythos 5 (16× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Macaron V1 Venti has not been scored yet, Claude Mythos 5 has not been scored yet and Hy4 preview has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Macaron V1 Venti, Claude Mythos 5 and Hy4 preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Macaron V1 Venti has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,024,000 for Hy4 preview and 1,000,000 for Claude Mythos 5. Maximum output per response: Macaron V1 Venti up to 131,072, Claude Mythos 5 up to 128,000, Hy4 preview up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Macaron V1 Venti accepts text; Claude Mythos 5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Hy4 preview accepts text. Claude Mythos 5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Macaron V1 Venti and Hy4 preview publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Claude Mythos 5 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Hy4 preview is the newest, released Aug 28, 2026. Macaron V1 Venti came out Jul 21, 2026; Claude Mythos 5 came out Jun 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Mythos 5 Jan 31, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
