LongCat-2.5-Preview vs Hy3
Hy3 comes out ahead, 58 to 52 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Meituan (LongCat)LongCat-2.5-Preview
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.75 / $2.95
- Context1M
- Our pick
TencentHy3
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.132 / $0.53
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Hy3 is our pick
Hy3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against LongCat-2.5-Preview (52). It leads on price. LongCat-2.5-Preview wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceHy3Hy3 $0.232 · LongCat-2.5-Preview $1.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLongCat-2.5-PreviewLongCat-2.5-Preview 1,000,000 · Hy3 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsLongCat-2.5-PreviewLongCat-2.5-Preview: Text, Images · Hy3: Text
- Self-hostingHy3Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | LongCat-2.5-Preview | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 44 | 80 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 52/100 | 58/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat) | Hy3Tencent |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.75 | $0.132 (best) |
| Output | $2.95 | $0.53 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.30 | $0.232 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 15 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeshigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | hy3 |
| API providers | 2 | 18 (best) |
| Released | Sep 25, 2026 | Jul 6, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- LongCat-2.5-Preview$13.40
- Hy3$2.38
Which should you choose?
Which is better: LongCat-2.5-Preview or Hy3?
Hy3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against LongCat-2.5-Preview (52). It leads on price. LongCat-2.5-Preview wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, LongCat-2.5-Preview or Hy3?
Hy3 is cheaper at $0.132 input / $0.53 output per million tokens (median across 15 API providers; free on Tencent TokenHub). LongCat-2.5-Preview costs $0.75 input / $2.95 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.232 per million tokens for Hy3 versus $1.30 for LongCat-2.5-Preview (5.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. LongCat-2.5-Preview has not been scored yet and Hy3 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for LongCat-2.5-Preview and Hy3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
LongCat-2.5-Preview has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 256,000 for Hy3. Maximum output per response: LongCat-2.5-Preview up to 131,072, Hy3 up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
LongCat-2.5-Preview accepts text and images; Hy3 accepts text. LongCat-2.5-Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Hy3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; LongCat-2.5-Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the newest, released Sep 25, 2026. Hy3 came out Jul 6, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
