Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
Too close to call on our weighted score (Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct 62, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 60). The right pick depends on what you value most.
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
60/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context131K
NVIDIA
Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
62/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct 62/100, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 60/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct on price and Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNemotron Mini 4B InstructNemotron Mini 4B Instruct Free · Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 $0.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 131,072 · Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1: Text · Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 89 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 60/100 | 62/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.15 | Free (best) |
| Output | $0.15 | Free (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15 | Free (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Nvidia API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | nvidia/llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1 | nvidia/nemotron-mini-4b-instruct |
| API providers | 2 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Apr 7, 2025 | Aug 21, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1$1.80
Nemotron Mini 4B InstructFree
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct 62/100, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 60/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct on price and Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct?
Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Nvidia API price). Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider; free on Nvidia). Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has not been scored yet and Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct. Maximum output per response: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 up to 131,072, Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 accepts text; Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the newest, released Apr 7, 2025. Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct came out Aug 21, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.