ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Gemma 3 27B IT vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Gemma 3 27B IT comes out ahead, 57 to 51 and 45 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Meta

    Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

    Released Dec 6, 2024

    45/100
    • ECI127.3
    • Price$0.59 / $0.753
    • Context128K
  2. Our pick

    Google

    Gemma 3 27B IT

    Released Mar 12, 2025

    57/100
    • ECI129.9
    • Price$0.11 / $0.30
    • Context131K
  3. Mistral AI

    Mistral Small 3.1 24B

    Released Mar 17, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI127.5
    • Price$0.351 / $0.555
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Gemma 3 27B IT is our pick

Gemma 3 27B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B (51) and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (45). It leads on capability and price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemma 3 27B ITCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 3 27B IT 129.9 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B 127.5 · Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 127.3
  • Lowest priceGemma 3 27B ITGemma 3 27B IT $0.157 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.402 · Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct $0.631 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemma 3 27B ITGemma 3 27B IT 131,072 · Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 128,000 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemma 3 27B IT and Mistral Small 3.1 24BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct: Text · Gemma 3 27B IT: Text, Images · Mistral Small 3.1 24B: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama-3.3-70B-InstructGemma 3 27B ITMistral Small 3.1 24B
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%495249
Price25%578466
Inputs & features15%255050
Context window10%242524
Overall100%45/10057/10051/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Gemma 3 27B IT vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama-3.3-70B-InstructMetaGemma 3 27B ITGoogleMistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)127.3129.9 (best)127.5
ECI rank#146 of 165#137 of 165 (best)#145 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions47.4%47.7% (best)47.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics5.1%22.5% (best)5.8%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.59$0.11 (best)$0.351
Output$0.753$0.30 (best)$0.555
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.631$0.157 (best)$0.402
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 37 providersMedian of 16 providersMedian of 9 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output4,096 tokens131,072 tokens (best)16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model ID———
API providers40 (best)179
ReleasedDec 6, 2024Mar 12, 2025Mar 17, 2025
Knowledge cutoffDec 2023Aug 2024Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct$7.41
  • Gemma 3 27B IT$1.69
  • Mistral Small 3.1 24B$4.62
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, Gemma 3 27B IT or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Gemma 3 27B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B (51) and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (45). It leads on capability and price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, Gemma 3 27B IT or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Gemma 3 27B IT is cheaper at $0.11 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers). Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 input / $0.555 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers); Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct costs $0.59 input / $0.753 output per million tokens (median across 37 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.157 per million tokens for Gemma 3 27B IT versus $0.402 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2.6× as much) and $0.631 for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B IT scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 3 27B IT 129.9 (#137 of 165), Mistral Small 3.1 24B 127.5 (#145 of 165) and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 127.3 (#146 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (124.2–132.1 vs 122.7–129.2), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemma 3 27B IT 47.7%, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 47.5%, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 47.4%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemma 3 27B IT 22.5%, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 5.8%, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 5.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, Gemma 3 27B IT and Mistral Small 3.1 24B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemma 3 27B IT leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 3 27B IT has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct up to 4,096, Gemma 3 27B IT up to 131,072, Mistral Small 3.1 24B up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct accepts text; Gemma 3 27B IT accepts text and images; Mistral Small 3.1 24B accepts text and images. Gemma 3 27B IT handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B is the newest, released Mar 17, 2025. Gemma 3 27B IT came out Mar 12, 2025; Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct came out Dec 6, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct Dec 2023, Gemma 3 27B IT Aug 2024, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.