ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct vs Mistral Large

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct comes out ahead, 44 to 40 on our weighted score.

  1. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct

    Released Sep 25, 2024

    44/100
    • ECI125.5
    • Price—
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct

  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large

    Released Feb 26, 2024

    40/100
    • ECI122.0
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove Mistral Large

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct is our pick

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Mistral Large (40). It leads on capability and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.

  • CapabilityLlama-3.2-90B-Vision-InstructCapabilities Index (ECI): Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct 125.5 · Mistral Large 122.0
  • Lowest priceMistral LargeMistral Large $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct unpriced
  • Longest contextAbout the sameLlama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct 128,000 · Mistral Large 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsLlama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct: Text, Images · Mistral Large: Text, PDFs
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.2-90B-Vision-InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Llama 3.2 Community License)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama-3.2-90B-Vision-InstructMistral Large
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)67%4642
Inputs & features20%5045
Context window13%2424
Overall100%44/10040/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct vs Mistral Large specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama-3.2-90B-Vision-InstructMetaMistral LargeMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)125.5 (best)122.0
ECI rank#150 of 165 (best)#153 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions41.0% (best)38.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics2.6% (best)1.9%
Price per million tokens
Input—$0.50
Output—$1.50
Cached input—$0.05
Blended (3:1)—$0.75
Long-context rate—Same rate
Price source—Official Mistral API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output4,096 tokens102,400 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoYes
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenLlama 3.2 Community LicenseProprietary
API model ID—mistral-large-latest
API providers111 (best)
ReleasedSep 25, 2024Feb 26, 2024
Knowledge cutoffDec 2023Nov 30, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct—
  • Mistral Large$8.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct or Mistral Large?

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Mistral Large (40). It leads on capability and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct or Mistral Large?

Mistral Large is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.75 per million tokens for Mistral Large versus . Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct 125.5 (#150 of 165) and Mistral Large 122.0 (#153 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (120.3–127.4 vs 115.7–124.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct 41.0%, Mistral Large 38.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct 2.6%, Mistral Large 1.9%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct and Mistral Large yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct and Mistral Large share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct up to 4,096, Mistral Large up to 102,400 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct accepts text and images; Mistral Large accepts text and PDFs. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct publishes its weights (Llama 3.2 Community License) and can be self-hosted; Mistral Large is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct is the newest, released Sep 25, 2024. Mistral Large came out Feb 26, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct Dec 2023, Mistral Large Nov 30, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons