Llama-3.2-3B vs GLM-4.5-Flash vs Pixtral 12B
Too close to call on our weighted score (GLM-4.5-Flash 65, Pixtral 12B 64, Llama-3.2-3B 49). The right pick depends on what you value most.
MetaLlama-3.2-3B
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.335
- Context131K
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5-Flash
65/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context131K
Mistral AIPixtral 12B
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context128K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (GLM-4.5-Flash 65/100, Pixtral 12B 64/100, Llama-3.2-3B 49/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.5-Flash on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGLM-4.5-FlashGLM-4.5-Flash Free · Pixtral 12B $0.15 · Llama-3.2-3B $0.159 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama-3.2-3B and GLM-4.5-FlashLlama-3.2-3B 131,072 · GLM-4.5-Flash 131,072 · Pixtral 12B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsPixtral 12BLlama-3.2-3B: Text · GLM-4.5-Flash: Text · Pixtral 12B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingLlama-3.2-3B and Pixtral 12BPublishes downloadable weights (Llama 3.2 Community License)
| Measure | Weight | Llama-3.2-3B | GLM-4.5-Flash | Pixtral 12B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 88 | 100 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 35 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 49/100 | 65/100 | 64/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Llama-3.2-3BMeta | GLM-4.5-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu) | Pixtral 12BMistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 | Free (best) | $0.15 |
| Output | $0.335 | Free (best) | $0.15 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.159 | Free (best) | $0.15 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Official Z.AI API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 98,304 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenLlama 3.2 Community License | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | glm-4.5-flash | pixtral-12b |
| API providers | 3 | 4 (best) | 4 (best) |
| Released | Sep 25, 2024 | Jul 28, 2025 | Sep 1, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2023 | Apr 2025 | Sep 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Llama-3.2-3B$1.67
- GLM-4.5-FlashFree
- Pixtral 12B$1.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Llama-3.2-3B, GLM-4.5-Flash or Pixtral 12B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (GLM-4.5-Flash 65/100, Pixtral 12B 64/100, Llama-3.2-3B 49/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.5-Flash on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Llama-3.2-3B, GLM-4.5-Flash or Pixtral 12B?
GLM-4.5-Flash is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Pixtral 12B costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Llama-3.2-3B costs $0.10 input / $0.335 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). GLM-4.5-Flash is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Llama-3.2-3B has not been scored yet, GLM-4.5-Flash has not been scored yet and Pixtral 12B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.2-3B, GLM-4.5-Flash and Pixtral 12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Llama-3.2-3B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama-3.2-3B and GLM-4.5-Flash have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 128,000 for Pixtral 12B. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.2-3B up to 8,192, GLM-4.5-Flash up to 98,304, Pixtral 12B up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Llama-3.2-3B accepts text; GLM-4.5-Flash accepts text; Pixtral 12B accepts text and images. Pixtral 12B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama-3.2-3B and Pixtral 12B publishes its weights (Llama 3.2 Community License) and can be self-hosted; GLM-4.5-Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GLM-4.5-Flash is the newest, released Jul 28, 2025. Llama-3.2-3B came out Sep 25, 2024; Pixtral 12B came out Sep 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.2-3B Dec 2023, GLM-4.5-Flash Apr 2025, Pixtral 12B Sep 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
