ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Solar Pro 2 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 62, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 62, Solar Pro 2 51). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Meta

    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    62/100
    • ECI116.4
    • Price$0.06 / $0.08
    • Context128K
  2. Upstage

    Solar Pro 2

    Released May 20, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.25
    • Context66K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

    Released Sep 19, 2024

    62/100
    • ECI118.5
    • Price$0.05 / $0.10
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 62/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 62/100, Solar Pro 2 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct on price and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct $0.063 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.065 · Solar Pro 2 $0.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct 131,072 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text · Solar Pro 2: Text · Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Qwen2.5 7B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama-3.1-8B-InstructSolar Pro 2Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Price50%10075100
Inputs & features30%253525
Context window20%241225
Overall100%62/10051/10062/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Solar Pro 2 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama-3.1-8B-InstructMetaSolar Pro 2UpstageQwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)116.4—118.5 (best)
ECI rank#162 of 165—#159 of 165 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions27.0%—35.5% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics1.7%—2.5% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.06$0.25$0.05 (best)
Output$0.08 (best)$0.25$0.10
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.065$0.25$0.063 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 17 providersOfficial Upstage APIMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Max output4,096 tokens8,192 tokens (best)8,192 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesminimal · highNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpenApache 2.0
API model ID—solar-pro2—
API providers18 (best)24
ReleasedJul 23, 2024May 20, 2025Sep 19, 2024
Knowledge cutoffDec 2023Mar 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$0.76
  • Solar Pro 2$3.00
  • Qwen2.5 7B Instruct$0.70
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Solar Pro 2 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 62/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 62/100, Solar Pro 2 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct on price and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Solar Pro 2 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct costs $0.06 input / $0.08 output per million tokens (median across 17 API providers); Solar Pro 2 costs $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.063 per million tokens for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct versus $0.065 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (1× as much) and $0.25 for Solar Pro 2 (4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct has an ECI of 116.4, Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has an ECI of 118.5.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Solar Pro 2 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and 65,536 for Solar Pro 2. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text; Solar Pro 2 accepts text; Qwen2.5 7B Instruct accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Solar Pro 2 is the newest, released May 20, 2025. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct came out Sep 19, 2024; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023, Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.