ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Mistral Nemo vs Ministral 8B Instruct

Too close to call on our weighted score (Mistral Nemo 43, Ministral 8B Instruct 42, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 42). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Meta

    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    42/100
    • ECI116.6
    • Price$0.152 / $0.167
    • Context128K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Nemo

    Released Jul 1, 2024

    43/100
    • ECI118.7
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context128K
  3. Mistral AI

    Ministral 8B Instruct

    Released Oct 16, 2024

    42/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Mistral Nemo 43/100, Ministral 8B Instruct 42/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 42/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Nemo for raw capability and Ministral 8B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityMistral NemoShared benchmarks: Mistral Nemo 29.9% · Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2% · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%
  • Lowest priceMistral Nemo and Ministral 8B InstructMistral Nemo $0.15 · Ministral 8B Instruct $0.15 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.156 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMinistral 8B InstructMinistral 8B Instruct 131,072 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 · Mistral Nemo 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text · Mistral Nemo: Text · Ministral 8B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama-3.1-8B-InstructMistral NemoMinistral 8B Instruct
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%273027
Price25%888989
Inputs & features15%252525
Context window10%242424
Overall100%42/10043/10042/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Mistral Nemo vs Ministral 8B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama-3.1-8B-InstructMetaMistral NemoMistral AIMinistral 8B InstructMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)116.6118.7 (best)—
ECI rank#145 of 148#140 of 148 (best)—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions27.0%29.9% (best)27.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics1.7%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.152$0.15 (best)$0.15 (best)
Output$0.167$0.15 (best)$0.15 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.156$0.15 (best)$0.15 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 9 providersOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Max output4,096 tokens128,000 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpenMistral Research License
API model ID—mistral-nemo—
API providers9 (best)51
ReleasedJul 23, 2024Jul 1, 2024Oct 16, 2024
Knowledge cutoffDec 2023Jul 2024—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$1.85
  • Mistral Nemo$1.80
  • Ministral 8B Instruct$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Mistral Nemo or Ministral 8B Instruct?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Mistral Nemo 43/100, Ministral 8B Instruct 42/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 42/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Nemo for raw capability and Ministral 8B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Mistral Nemo or Ministral 8B Instruct?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Ministral 8B Instruct costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct costs $0.152 input / $0.167 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Mistral Nemo versus $0.15 for Ministral 8B Instruct (1× as much) and $0.156 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond): Mistral Nemo 29.9%, Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2% and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Nemo 29.9%, Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Mistral Nemo and Ministral 8B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Nemo leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 8B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and 128,000 for Mistral Nemo. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096, Mistral Nemo up to 128,000, Ministral 8B Instruct up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text; Mistral Nemo accepts text; Ministral 8B Instruct accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Mistral Research License), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Ministral 8B Instruct is the newest, released Oct 16, 2024. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024; Mistral Nemo came out Jul 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023, Mistral Nemo Jul 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.