ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Ministral 8B Instruct vs Qwen-VL OCR

Too close to call on our weighted score (Ministral 8B Instruct 57, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 56, Qwen-VL OCR 36). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Meta

    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    56/100
    • ECI116.6
    • Price$0.152 / $0.167
    • Context128K
  2. Mistral AI

    Ministral 8B Instruct

    Released Oct 16, 2024

    57/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context131K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen-VL OCR

    Released Oct 28, 2024

    36/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.72 / $0.72
    • Context34K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Ministral 8B Instruct 57/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 56/100, Qwen-VL OCR 36/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Ministral 8B Instruct on price and Ministral 8B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMinistral 8B InstructMinistral 8B Instruct $0.15 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.156 · Qwen-VL OCR $0.72 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMinistral 8B InstructMinistral 8B Instruct 131,072 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 · Qwen-VL OCR 34,096 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen-VL OCRLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text · Ministral 8B Instruct: Text · Qwen-VL OCR: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Ministral 8B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Mistral Research License)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama-3.1-8B-InstructMinistral 8B InstructQwen-VL OCR
Price50%888957
Inputs & features30%252525
Context window20%24241
Overall100%56/10057/10036/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Ministral 8B Instruct vs Qwen-VL OCR specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama-3.1-8B-InstructMetaMinistral 8B InstructMistral AIQwen-VL OCRAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)116.6——
ECI rank#145 of 148——
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions27.0%27.2% (best)—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics1.7%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.152$0.15 (best)$0.72
Output$0.167$0.15 (best)$0.72
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.156$0.15 (best)$0.72
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 9 providersMedian of 1 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)34,096 tokens
Max output4,096 tokens8,192 tokens (best)4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenMistral Research LicenseProprietary
API model ID——qwen-vl-ocr
API providers9 (best)11
ReleasedJul 23, 2024Oct 16, 2024Oct 28, 2024
Knowledge cutoffDec 2023—Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$1.85
  • Ministral 8B Instruct$1.80
  • Qwen-VL OCR$8.64
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Ministral 8B Instruct or Qwen-VL OCR?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Ministral 8B Instruct 57/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 56/100, Qwen-VL OCR 36/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Ministral 8B Instruct on price and Ministral 8B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Ministral 8B Instruct or Qwen-VL OCR?

Ministral 8B Instruct is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct costs $0.152 input / $0.167 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers); Qwen-VL OCR costs $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Ministral 8B Instruct versus $0.156 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (1× as much) and $0.72 for Qwen-VL OCR (4.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct has an ECI of 116.6, Ministral 8B Instruct has not been scored yet and Qwen-VL OCR has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Ministral 8B Instruct and Qwen-VL OCR yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen-VL OCR does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 8B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and 34,096 for Qwen-VL OCR. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096, Ministral 8B Instruct up to 8,192, Qwen-VL OCR up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text; Ministral 8B Instruct accepts text; Qwen-VL OCR accepts text and images. Qwen-VL OCR handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Ministral 8B Instruct publishes its weights (Mistral Research License) and can be self-hosted; Qwen-VL OCR is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen-VL OCR is the newest, released Oct 28, 2024. Ministral 8B Instruct came out Oct 16, 2024; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023, Qwen-VL OCR Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.