ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Ministral 8B Instruct vs Qwen Turbo

Qwen Turbo comes out ahead, 57 to 42 and 42 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Meta

    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    42/100
    • ECI116.6
    • Price$0.152 / $0.167
    • Context128K
  2. Mistral AI

    Ministral 8B Instruct

    Released Oct 16, 2024

    42/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen Turbo

    Released Nov 1, 2024

    57/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.05 / $0.20
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Qwen Turbo is our pick

Qwen Turbo is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Ministral 8B Instruct (42) and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (42). It leads on capability, price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct and Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityQwen TurboShared benchmarks: Qwen Turbo 41.8% · Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2% · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%
  • Lowest priceQwen TurboQwen Turbo $0.087 · Ministral 8B Instruct $0.15 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.156 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen TurboQwen Turbo 1,000,000 · Ministral 8B Instruct 131,072 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text · Ministral 8B Instruct: Text · Qwen Turbo: Text
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Ministral 8B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Mistral Research License)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama-3.1-8B-InstructMinistral 8B InstructQwen Turbo
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%272742
Price25%8889100
Inputs & features15%252535
Context window10%242460
Overall100%42/10042/10057/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Ministral 8B Instruct vs Qwen Turbo specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama-3.1-8B-InstructMetaMinistral 8B InstructMistral AIQwen TurboAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)116.6——
ECI rank#145 of 148——
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions27.0%27.2%41.8% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics1.7%—6.1% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.152$0.15$0.05 (best)
Output$0.167$0.15 (best)$0.20
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.156$0.15$0.087 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 9 providersMedian of 1 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output4,096 tokens8,192 tokens16,384 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenMistral Research LicenseProprietary
API model ID——qwen-turbo
API providers9 (best)13
ReleasedJul 23, 2024Oct 16, 2024Nov 1, 2024
Knowledge cutoffDec 2023—Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$1.85
  • Ministral 8B Instruct$1.80
  • Qwen Turbo$0.90
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Ministral 8B Instruct or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Ministral 8B Instruct (42) and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (42). It leads on capability, price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct and Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Ministral 8B Instruct or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Ministral 8B Instruct costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct costs $0.152 input / $0.167 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.087 per million tokens for Qwen Turbo versus $0.15 for Ministral 8B Instruct (1.7× as much) and $0.156 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (1.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond): Qwen Turbo 41.8%, Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2% and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen Turbo 41.8%, Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Ministral 8B Instruct and Qwen Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen Turbo leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Turbo has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Ministral 8B Instruct and 128,000 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096, Ministral 8B Instruct up to 8,192, Qwen Turbo up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text; Ministral 8B Instruct accepts text; Qwen Turbo accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Ministral 8B Instruct publishes its weights (Mistral Research License) and can be self-hosted; Qwen Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen Turbo is the newest, released Nov 1, 2024. Ministral 8B Instruct came out Oct 16, 2024; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023, Qwen Turbo Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.