Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Ministral 3B vs Nova Micro
Too close to call on our weighted score (Nova Micro 62, Ministral 3B 61, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 56). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Meta
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
56/100- ECI116.6
- Price$0.152 / $0.167
- Context128K
Mistral AI
Ministral 3B
61/100- ECI118.1
- Price$0.10 / $0.10
- Context128K
Amazon
Nova Micro
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.035 / $0.14
- Context128K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Nova Micro 62/100, Ministral 3B 61/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 56/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Nova Micro on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova MicroNova Micro $0.061 · Ministral 3B $0.10 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.156 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 · Ministral 3B 128,000 · Nova Micro 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text · Ministral 3B: Text · Nova Micro: Text
- Self-hostingLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Ministral 3BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | Ministral 3B | Nova Micro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 88 | 97 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 56/100 | 61/100 | 62/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 116.6 | 118.1 (best) | — |
| ECI rank | #145 of 148 | #144 of 148 (best) | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 27.0% (best) | 25.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 1.7% | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.152 | $0.10 | $0.035 (best) |
| Output | $0.167 | $0.10 (best) | $0.14 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.0088 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.156 | $0.10 | $0.061 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 9 providers | Median of 1 providers | Official Amazon Bedrock API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 10,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | amazon.nova-micro-v1:0 |
| API providers | 9 (best) | 1 | 3 |
| Released | Jul 23, 2024 | Oct 16, 2024 | Dec 3, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Oct 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$1.85
Ministral 3B$1.20
Nova Micro$0.63
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Ministral 3B or Nova Micro?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Nova Micro 62/100, Ministral 3B 61/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 56/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Nova Micro on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Ministral 3B or Nova Micro?
Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 input / $0.14 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Ministral 3B costs $0.10 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct costs $0.152 input / $0.167 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.061 per million tokens for Nova Micro versus $0.10 for Ministral 3B (1.6× as much) and $0.156 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (2.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct has an ECI of 116.6, Ministral 3B has an ECI of 118.1 and Nova Micro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Ministral 3B and Nova Micro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Ministral 3B and Nova Micro share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096, Ministral 3B up to 8,192, Nova Micro up to 10,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text; Ministral 3B accepts text; Nova Micro accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Ministral 3B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova Micro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nova Micro is the newest, released Dec 3, 2024. Ministral 3B came out Oct 16, 2024; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023, Ministral 3B Mar 2024, Nova Micro Oct 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.