Ling-1T vs Morph V3 Fast vs GLM-4.6
GLM-4.6 comes out ahead, 41 to 36 and 32 on our weighted score, though Morph V3 Fast is 10% cheaper per token.
inclusionAILing-1T
36/100- ECI—
- Price$0.57 / $2.29
- Context128K
Morph
Morph V3 Fast
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $1.20
- Context262K
- Our pick
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.6
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.20
- Context205K
GLM-4.6 is our pick
GLM-4.6 is the better all-round choice, scoring 41/100 against Ling-1T (36) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on inputs & features. Morph V3 Fast wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast $0.90 · Ling-1T $1.00 · GLM-4.6 $1.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast 262,144 · GLM-4.6 204,800 · Ling-1T 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsLing-1T: Text · Morph V3 Fast: Text · GLM-4.6: Text
- Self-hostingLing-1T and GLM-4.6Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Ling-1T | Morph V3 Fast | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 48 | 50 | 48 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 0 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 37 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 36/100 | 32/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ling-1TinclusionAI | Morph V3 FastMorph | GLM-4.6Z.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.57 (best) | $0.80 | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.29 | $1.20 (best) | $2.20 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.11 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.00 | $0.90 (best) | $1.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Bailing API | Median of 5 providers | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 32,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | Ling-1T | — | glm-4.6 |
| API providers | 1 | 5 | 29 (best) |
| Released | Oct 2025 | Jul 7, 2025 | Sep 30, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2024 | — | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ling-1T$10.28
- Morph V3 Fast$10.40
- GLM-4.6$10.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ling-1T, Morph V3 Fast or GLM-4.6?
GLM-4.6 is the better all-round choice, scoring 41/100 against Ling-1T (36) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on inputs & features. Morph V3 Fast wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Ling-1T, Morph V3 Fast or GLM-4.6?
Morph V3 Fast is cheaper at $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Ling-1T costs $0.57 input / $2.29 output per million tokens (official Bailing API price); GLM-4.6 costs $0.60 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for Morph V3 Fast versus $1.00 for Ling-1T (1.1× as much) and $1.00 for GLM-4.6 (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Ling-1T has not been scored yet, Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet and GLM-4.6 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ling-1T, Morph V3 Fast and GLM-4.6 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Morph V3 Fast does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Morph V3 Fast has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 204,800 for GLM-4.6 and 128,000 for Ling-1T. Maximum output per response: Ling-1T up to 32,000, Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072, GLM-4.6 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ling-1T accepts text; Morph V3 Fast accepts text; GLM-4.6 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Ling-1T and GLM-4.6 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Morph V3 Fast is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Ling-1T is the newest, released Oct 2025. GLM-4.6 came out Sep 30, 2025; Morph V3 Fast came out Jul 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Ling-1T Jun 2024, GLM-4.6 Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
