Laguna S 2.1 vs GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Gemma 4 12B IT
Gemma 4 12B IT comes out ahead, 75 to 69 and 30 on our weighted score.
PoolsideLaguna S 2.1
69/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.20
- Context1.05M
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Cyber
30/100- ECI—
- Price$12.50 / $75.00
- Context400K
- Our pick
GoogleGemma 4 12B IT
75/100- ECI—
- Price$0.075 / $0.275
- Context262K
Gemma 4 12B IT is our pick
Gemma 4 12B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 75/100 against Laguna S 2.1 (69) and GPT-5.6 Cyber (30). Laguna S 2.1 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLaguna S 2.1 and Gemma 4 12B ITLaguna S 2.1 $0.125 · Gemma 4 12B IT $0.125 · GPT-5.6 Cyber $28.13 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLaguna S 2.1Laguna S 2.1 1,048,576 · GPT-5.6 Cyber 400,000 · Gemma 4 12B IT 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-5.6 Cyber and Gemma 4 12B ITLaguna S 2.1: Text · GPT-5.6 Cyber: Text, Images · Gemma 4 12B IT: Text, Images
- Self-hostingLaguna S 2.1 and Gemma 4 12B ITPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Laguna S 2.1 | GPT-5.6 Cyber | Gemma 4 12B IT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 70 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 44 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 69/100 | 30/100 | 75/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Laguna S 2.1Poolside | GPT-5.6 CyberOpenAI | Gemma 4 12B ITGoogle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 | $12.50 | $0.075 (best) |
| Output | $0.20 (best) | $75.00 | $0.275 |
| Cached input | — | $1.25 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.125 (best) | $28.13 | $0.125 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 4 providers | Official OpenAI API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 400,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | poolside/laguna-s-2.1 | gpt-daybreak-red-latest | — |
| API providers | 6 (best) | 1 | 2 |
| Released | Jul 21, 2026 | Aug 7, 2026 | Jun 9, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Feb 16, 2026 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Laguna S 2.1$1.40
- GPT-5.6 Cyber$275.00
- Gemma 4 12B IT$1.30
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Laguna S 2.1, GPT-5.6 Cyber or Gemma 4 12B IT?
Gemma 4 12B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 75/100 against Laguna S 2.1 (69) and GPT-5.6 Cyber (30). Laguna S 2.1 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Laguna S 2.1, GPT-5.6 Cyber or Gemma 4 12B IT?
Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Poolside). Gemma 4 12B IT costs $0.075 input / $0.275 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); GPT-5.6 Cyber costs $12.50 input / $75.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.125 per million tokens for Laguna S 2.1 versus $0.125 for Gemma 4 12B IT (1× as much) and $28.13 for GPT-5.6 Cyber (225× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Laguna S 2.1 has not been scored yet, GPT-5.6 Cyber has not been scored yet and Gemma 4 12B IT has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Laguna S 2.1, GPT-5.6 Cyber and Gemma 4 12B IT yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna S 2.1 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.6 Cyber and 262,144 for Gemma 4 12B IT. Maximum output per response: Laguna S 2.1 up to 32,768, GPT-5.6 Cyber up to 128,000, Gemma 4 12B IT up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Laguna S 2.1 accepts text; GPT-5.6 Cyber accepts text and images; Gemma 4 12B IT accepts text and images. GPT-5.6 Cyber handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Laguna S 2.1 and Gemma 4 12B IT publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.6 Cyber is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GPT-5.6 Cyber is the newest, released Aug 7, 2026. Laguna S 2.1 came out Jul 21, 2026; Gemma 4 12B IT came out Jun 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.6 Cyber Feb 16, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
