Kling v3.0 vs Wan v2.6
Preferred for image to video: Kling v3.0 · Lowest entry price: Kling v3.0 · Longest clips: Kling v3.0. Quality scores are blind human-preference votes; specs and prices come from each lab’s listings.
Kling AI
Kling v3.0
- Arena1,354
- From$0.084/s
- Max length15 s
Alibaba (Qwen)
Wan v2.6
- Arena1,327
- From$0.10/s
- Max length10 s
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Where they differ
Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.
- Preferred for image to videoKling v3.0Kling v3.0 1,354 (#19) · Wan v2.6 1,310 (#23) — blind human votes
- Lowest entry priceKling v3.0Kling v3.0 from $0.084/s (720p) · Wan v2.6 from $0.10/s (720p)
- Longest clipsKling v3.0Kling v3.0: 3–15 s · Wan v2.6: 5–10 s
- Highest resolutionWan v2.6Kling v3.0: 720p · Wan v2.6: 1080p
- NewestKling v3.0Kling v3.0 Feb 5, 2026 · Wan v2.6 Dec 16, 2025
- Widest inputsWan v2.6Kling v3.0: Text prompts, Reference images · Wan v2.6: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video
- Native audioBoth generate soundGenerates an audio track with the video: Kling v3.0 yes · Wan v2.6 yes
- Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Kling v3.0 yes · Wan v2.6 yes
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
- Most API hostsSame reachKling v3.0: 1 · Wan v2.6: 1
Every spec in one table
Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Quality (blind human votes) | ||
| Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | — | 1,327 ±7#21 of 48 · 54,050 votes |
| Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,354 ±6#19 of 48 · 206,221 votes (best) | 1,310 ±7#23 of 48 · 121,082 votes |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $0.084/s 720p, Standard (best) | $0.10/s 720p |
| Top price | $0.168/s 720p, Pro, with audio | $0.15/s 1080p |
| 10-second clip | $0.84at the starting rate (best) | $1.00at the starting rate |
| How it is billed | Per second | Per second |
| Output | ||
| Produces | Video with sound | Video with sound |
| Resolutions | 720p | 720p · 1080p |
| Highest resolution | 720p | 1080p (best) |
| Clip length | 3–15 s | 5–10 s |
| Longest clip | 15 s (best) | 10 s |
| Sound | Optional | Optional |
| Frame control | First and last frame | First frame only |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9 · 9:16 · 1:1 | — |
| Inputs | ||
| Text prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Start image (image to video) | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | No | Yes |
| Audio input | No | Yes |
| References | — | Video and audio |
| Access | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API hosts | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Feb 5, 2026 | Dec 16, 2025 |
Which should you choose?
Which is better, Kling v3.0 or Wan v2.6?
For image to video, voters prefer Kling v3.0 (Kling v3.0 1,354 (#19) · Wan v2.6 1,310 (#23)). Arena scores come from blind, side-by-side human votes on the same prompts; when the gap is inside both models’ error margins we call it a tie. Test your own prompts before you commit.
Which is cheaper?
Kling v3.0 costs from $0.084/s (720p), up to $0.168/s (720p, Pro, with audio); Wan v2.6 costs from $0.10/s (720p), up to $0.15/s (1080p). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Kling v3.0 $0.84, Wan v2.6 $1.00. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.
How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?
Kling v3.0: 3–15 s, 720p; Wan v2.6: 5–10 s, 720p / 1080p.
What is the difference between Kling v3.0 and Wan v2.6?
Kling v3.0 is a video model from Kling AI (Feb 5, 2026), taking text prompts and reference images and producing video with sound. Wan v2.6 is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Dec 16, 2025), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound.
Which is newer?
Kling v3.0 Feb 5, 2026; Wan v2.6 Dec 16, 2025.
Which generates video with sound?
Generates an audio track with the video: Kling v3.0 yes; Wan v2.6 yes.
Can I run any of these on my own hardware?
No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.